Category: News

  • Viva Raw Recall 2024 – Salmonella

    Viva Raw Recall 2024 – Salmonella

    Recall alert: Viva Raw Pet Food has recalled 9,760 pounds of raw dog and cat food because of listeria and salmonella contamination.

    The recall was prompted by a consumer complaint, which subsequently led the FDA to acquire and test samples of the food from lot #22853. This may indicate a lapse in quality control at the manufacturing facility.

    This particular lot was distributed between October 24, 2023, and December 6, 2023. The Viva Raw Recall was initiated on January 27th, 2024.

    Information about the recall can be found in this document from Viva Raw.

    Viva Raw Recall for Salmonella & Listeria

    Salmonella can cause illness in both animals who consume the contaminated products and humans who handle them, posing a risk to both pet owners and their pets.

    Listeria is a type of bacteria that can cause a foodborne illness called listeriosis when consumed.

    Dogs can suffer from Listeria and Salmonella poisoning.

    While it is more commonly associated with humans, dogs can become infected with Listeria or salmonella bacteria if they consume contaminated food, particularly raw or undercooked meat, or other foods contaminated with the bacteria.

    Symptoms may include diarrhea, vomiting, fever, lethargy, and, in severe cases, neurological symptoms. If you suspect your dog may have consumed contaminated food, it’s important to consult a veterinarian for proper diagnosis and treatment.

    Dogs can shed food-borne pathogens in their saliva and stool; when handling and feeding raw pet food it is important to use good hygiene and sanitation practices.

    Studies indicate that while salmonella, listeria, and E. coli have been detected in both raw and dry pet foods, the strains found in raw pet food are more frequently resistant to drugs.

    Additionally, raw pet food is much more likely to contain potentially harmful bacteria and pathogens than dry pet food.

    On their website, Viva Raw statesWe use validated hurdle methods such as an organic lactic acid spray on all of meat & vegetable ingredients and monitor our product temperature to stay within 28-32F during production. Finally, we test each batch of food for Salmonella, E. Coli, and Listeria monocytogenes & swab our production area regularly for Listeria monocytogenes as well.

    If you believe your pet has been made sick by Viva Raw or any other pet food, contact your veterinarian and submit a report to the FDA HERE.

  • Keto Natural Pet Foods vs. Hill’s Science Diet Lawsuit

    Keto Natural Pet Foods vs. Hill’s Science Diet Lawsuit

    Another day, another round of pet food lawsuits, recalls, misinformation, and drama. I suspect this is going to be a big one! On February 6th, 2024, Keto Natural Pet Foods filed a massive class action lawsuit against Hill’s Science Diet. Keto Natural Pet Foods vs. Hill’s Pet Nutrition is a hot topic, with a controversial argument.

    They claim that Hill’s Science Diet and a handful of top veterinary specialists “participated in an egregious, wide-ranging, and damaging campaign of coordinated, for-profit, faux-scientific misinformation.”

    Here is the list of Defendants listed in the lawsuit:

    • Hill’s Science Diet
    • Morris Animal Foundation – Mark Morris Institute
    • Dr. Lisa M. Freeman – Board Certified Veterinary Nutritionist
    • Dr. Darcy B. Adin – Board Certified Veterinary Cardiologist
    • Dr. Joshua A. Stern – Board Certified Veterinary Cardiologist
    • Dr. Ryan C. Fries – Board Certified Veterinary Cardiologist
    • Dr. John E. Rush – Board Certified Veterinary Cardiologist

    To put this in simple terms, Keto Naturals pet food is alleging that Hill’s Science Diet and the above list of highly-educated veterinary specialists fabricated the entire grain-free DCM heart disease debate to gain back lost market share from boutique and small food brands.

    What is the “Grain-Free DCM Heart Disease Debate?

    This issue in pet food revolves around concerns that certain grain-free diets may be linked to an increased incidence of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs. While some believe that grain-free and boutique diets can contribute to DCM, others argue that insufficient evidence exists to establish a direct causal relationship, prompting ongoing discussions and research in the pet food industry. You can learn more about this HERE.

    I have so many thoughts. As always, our blog relies on published evidence, common sense, and cited research. We do not resort to fear-mongering or insincere sensationalism! This blog post is your one-stop place to learn more about this issue. Please like, share, and follow. Read on, friends.

    Keto natural pet foods vs. Hill's Science Diet Lawsuit

    Keto Naturals Ketona Pet Food

    To better understand the source of this lawsuit, I did some digging into the company behind it.

    Keto Naturals is a boutique pet food company in the truest sense of the word. According to Grips Intelligence, their yearly sales revenue is below $1 Million U.S.D.

    Compare that to Hill’s Science Diet, whose 2023 revenue sits at $4 Billion U.S.D.

    If they wanted to, Hill’s could buy Keto Naturals and stuff it in a closet. Their measly revenue is not, and has never been, a threat to Hill’s Science Diet.

    Keto Naturals markets their pet food as a low-carb Keto and “natural” diet option for pets.

    The ketogenic diet trend in humans has led to the emergence of low-carb, high-protein, high-fat pet foods marketed as “keto” options for dogs and cats. (Learn more about diet trends, toxic diet culture, and white supremacy, here1)

    However, while some pet owners are drawn to these products due to their alignment with human dietary fads, there is an ongoing debate among experts about the suitability and safety of ketogenic diets for animals. There is minimal research supporting the use of Ketogenic diets, while a considerable body of evidence suggests various potential problems associated with them.

    Numerous specialists emphasize that Ketogenic diets may not be suitable for most humans either2, due to the connection with yo-yo dieting, disordered eating, and potential risks to internal heart, liver, and kidney health.

    Some dogs may have underlying health conditions that could be exacerbated by a ketogenic diet, such as pancreatitis (which is implicated here).3

    6 2

    The Keto Naturals Brand & Founder

    Here are some other things we know about Keto Naturals / Ketona Pet Food and its founder:

    • Their food is co-packed by big factories that make many other brands for other companies.
    • There is no qualified nutritionist on staff.
    • It is unclear where the recipes are from, and if a qualified nutritionist consultant was used in their creation.
    • Keto Naturals does not participate in or publish peer-reviewed research or feeding trials.
    • They have a “science” page on their website pointing to a belief that carbs are fattening for humans and dogs. That is a theory that has remained unsubstantiated and is often refuted in published research.
    • A lot of their marketing is centered around bashing competitors (Such as the Farmer’s Dog) and other food types (including raw and fresh), as well as AAFCO regulations and standard practices for food nutrient testing.
    • Their website states that their foods have never been associated with a single case of nutritional DCM. However, their market share is abysmal. Some of the revenue comes from supplements they sell, not complete diets. The company has only been around since 2018, and very few dogs eat their food.
    • Keto Naturals’ outspoken founder and CEO Daniel Schulof is a lawyer. He is not an animal scientist, biologist, qualified nutritionist, or veterinarian.

    Despite having no formal education in animal nutrition, biology, or veterinary science, Daniel Schulof has positioned himself as an expert authority on this topic and even published a book that he says has been critically acclaimed.

    He does have a $200 certificate in pet nutrition from a RACE-approved veterinary CE online course. He openly declares his readiness to challenge anyone with superior credentials, firmly believing that his knowledge exceeds theirs.

    This information is easy to find via a quick Google search, where his LinkedIn profile is publicly visible.

    He is boldly challenging a group of veterinary researchers and specialists who possess significantly more education and expertise than he does.

    I’m going to say something controversial about Keto Natural Pet Foods vs. Hill’s, but hear me out.

    I believe that the Keto Natural vs. Hill’s Science Diet Lawsuit is a brilliant marketing move.

    This news has spread rapidly across social media, leading to increased interest in Keto Naturals and higher engagement with their content.

    By submitting a controversial and potentially frivolous lawsuit, costing around $400 U.S.D., the brand has garnered significant attention in the pet community. Holistic veterinarians and “consumer advocates” are buzzing, selectively promoting information that supports the arguments presented in the lawsuit.

    How ironic.

    Keto Naturals History & the DCM Debate

    Daniel Schulof (founder of Keto Naturals) is no stranger to engaging in this controversy. He practically invented it.

    In the lawsuit document, he references an article that was published in the JAMVA on December 1st, 2018.4 This article was, at the time of his dispute with it in 2019, the most widely read article on the JAVMA website.

    He wanted that article removed, so he created a website called “Veterinary Integrity” and collected the signatures of veterinarians, scientists, human medical providers, representatives of grain-free pet food companies, and individual pet owners. His petition demanded the removal of the above editorial commentary piece from the JAMVA. (Read his demand letter HERE). 5

    Despite the submission of the petition to JAVMA, the article was not retracted.

    Certainly, the signatures he amassed predominantly reflected the views of a minority subset consisting of “holistic” veterinarians, pet food companies, and individuals inclined towards extreme “wellness” ideologies that often overlook scientific evidence. These signatures did not align with the sentiments of the majority of veterinarians and pet owners.

    5 2

    Keto Natural Pet Foods vs. Hill’s Lawsuit & Arguments

    Determining whether Keto Naturals has a case against Hill’s Science Diet would depend on various factors, including the evidence presented, legal arguments, and the interpretation of relevant laws and regulations.

    Author’s Note: Hello Danes does not necessarily agree with the following statements and arguments made in the Keto Naturals vs. Hill’s Science Diet lawsuit filing. This is being provided for informational purposes only:

    In the text of the lawsuit (which can be found here)6, the company implies and believes that:

    1. Hill’s Science Diet collaborated with several veterinary specialists to falsely claim that all “non-traditional” dog foods raise the risk of canine DCM.
    2. They deceitfully encouraged the FDA to investigate DCM cases by cherry-picking data.
    3. Studies have not proven definitive causation.
    4. They popularized the term “BEG” diets (Boutique, Exotic, Grain-Free) to implicate competitors and used blogs, websites, and social media to shape the narrative.
    5. This led to significant losses for “BEG” pet food companies like Keto Naturals, which alleges its reputation was unfairly damaged.
    6. Veterinarians who spread information about grain-free diets received it from Hill’s Science Diet and the Veterinary Defendants, raising concerns about funding and influence.
    7. The Veterinary Defendants also have a conflict of interest due to their involvement in research funded by Hill’s Science Diet.

    In this specific case, it seems like a class action is being pursued. This means that other small pet food companies could potentially join the case and seek compensation from any eventual judgment or settlement (if there is one, and that is a big if).


    As a journalist, I typically strive to remain impartial while supporting my argument with published research and science.

    It’s worth pointing out that the founder of Keto Naturals seems quite upset by what he feels is a loss of consumer trust in his brand (and thus, revenue), and he wants somewhere to place the blame.

    Conveniently, his argument also happens to stand on a very controversial platform.

    Controversy sells.

    4 2

    Grain-Free Diets and DCM Heart Disease in Dogs

    In 2014, Veterinary Cardiologists initiated communication with the FDA regarding an alarming trend they had been noticing of atypical heart disease. This led the FDA to begin collecting data from Veterinary Specialists (some of whom are defendants in this lawsuit).

    An announcement from the FDA in 20187 (four years later) aimed to gather more information from affected pet owners, sparking a prolonged debate that continues into 2024. Coincidentally, Keto Naturals Pet Food was started in 2018. The discussion had already been happening, and they were late to the party.

    Despite the implication made in the lawsuit that “no research has proven a link between grain-free foods and heart disease in dogs”, there is a lot more to that story.

    The FDA has a helpful Q&A page8 that beautifully explains a lot of the information available to us regarding DCM and Nutritional Factors.

    A study published in December 20229 showed that dogs fed non-traditional diets showed lower cardiac function and higher ventricular volume than dogs fed diets without potatoes or pulses. This study, like others, underscores the necessity for ongoing research and exploration into the matter.10

    Veterinarians nationwide consistently observe a rise in atypical heart disease cases among patients fed non-traditional, BEG, or grain-free diets. Many instances reportedly show improvement or reversal with diet change.

    While it’s very possible that most dogs can eat BEG-style diets their whole lives without issue, some cannot. It may take years to sort out why.

    The Keto Natural Pet Foods Inc. lawsuit against Hill’s Science Diet is adding fuel to the flames. To deny the hundreds of pet parents, whose pets were diagnosed with nutritional DCM and were harmed by boutique pet foods, is disingenuous.

    Moreover, nutrition science is a highly complex and expanding area of research. It’s concerning that the owner of a small company, who is a lawyer and not a veterinary scientist, feels confident in arguing so egregiously against something about which he has limited knowledge and personal experience.

    Given his background as a lawyer, one would anticipate his understanding of the peer-review process in research and science. However, it is troubling that he dismisses any critical studies and discussion on this topic, attributing it all to perceived financial influence and conflict of interest.

    7 2

    Does Keto Naturals Have a Case Against Hill’s Nutrition?

    I’m not a legal professional, so I can’t provide a definitive answer. However, I’m open to sharing my thoughts and speculations on the matter.

    Frivolous lawsuits are often considered baseless, lacking in legal reasoning or evidence to support the claims made. They may be filed for reasons such as harassment, intimidation, or to exploit the legal system for personal gain (see above, this is exceptionally good marketing for Keto Naturals brand).

    Frivolous lawsuits can waste time and resources for both parties involved and can clog up the court system.

    I observe a fledgling brand (Keto Naturals/Ketona) investing its limited time and resources into challenging top veterinary specialists and a large company (Hill’s Pet Nutrition) that is backed by extensive volumes of peer-reviewed scientific research.

    At its core, that is frivolous.

    The suggestion that multiple veterinary researchers have colluded with a single company to deliberately undermine small brands like Keto Naturals (whose revenue, even when combined with several other smaller brands, poses no threat to Hill’s bottom line) is far-fetched.

    To prevail in this case, they’ll need to provide substantial evidence that these events occurred and were intentional. Many statements in the legal filing appear akin to a toddler’s tantrum, which may not be taken seriously by a judge.

    Keto Natural Pet Food attributes its stagnant growth to the DCM “scheme” allegedly orchestrated by Hill’s Pet Nutrition and its purported co-conspirators, overlooking the simple fact that there may just not be much interest in Keto Dog Food among consumers.

    The popularity of the human Keto diet trend is waning as people become more aware of the health risks associated with extreme and restrictive diets. It’s logical to assume that a boutique pet food company attempting to capitalize on this trend would face challenges, regardless of external factors.

    1 2

    With many things in the world of pet food, there are two sides.

    On one side, there’s the often anti-science “holistic” faction, advocating for what they view as a more “natural” approach. Unfortunately, many adherents to this philosophy regularly undermine the credibility of experts and engage in the propagation of conspiracy theories. This side stands firmly with Keto Naturals, as for years they have shared the same unsubstantiated arguments that he does.

    On the other side, there’s the pro-veterinary research faction, committed to uncovering the truth through scientific methods, diligent peer-reviewed research, and evidence-based practices.

    It will be interesting to see how this shakes out, but for now, I’m choosing to continue standing with science.

    Disclaimer: The information provided regarding the KetoNatural Pet Foods Inc. vs. Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. lawsuit is for informational purposes only. We are not legal professionals, and any information presented is a journalistic interpretation and should not be construed as legal advice. Additionally, our site is not affiliated with, or funded by the FDA, Hill’s Science Diet, or Veterinary Researchers.

    Footnotes

    1. Diet culture is rooted in racism, white supremacy, and colonialism, Marisa Crane
      BS
      ↩︎
    2. Ketogenic diet: What are the risks? U.C. Davis. Natalie Helms ↩︎
    3. Cridge H, Lim SY, Algül H, Steiner JM. New insights into the etiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of pancreatitis in dogs: Potential impacts on clinical practice. J Vet Intern Med. 2022 May;36(3):847-864. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16437. Epub 2022 May 12. PMID: 35546513; PMCID: PMC9151489. ↩︎
    4. Freeman, L. M., Stern, J. A., Fries, R., Adin, D. B., & Rush, J. E. (2018). Diet-associated dilated cardiomyopathy in dogs: what do we know?. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association253(11), 1390-1394. Retrieved Feb 13, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.253.11.1390 ↩︎
    5. Daniel Schulof Demand Letter to the AVMA, January 26th, 2019 ↩︎
    6. Keto Naturals Inc. vs. Hill’s Science Diet Inc. Class Action Lawsuit Document ↩︎
    7. FDA Investigating Potential Connection Between Diet and Cases of Canine Heart Disease ↩︎
    8. Questions & Answers: FDA’s Work on Potential Causes of Non-Hereditary DCM in Dogs ↩︎
    9. Owens EJ, LeBlanc NL, Freeman LM, Scollan KF. Comparison of echocardiographic measurements and cardiac biomarkers in healthy dogs eating nontraditional or traditional diets. J Vet Intern Med. 2023; 37(1): 37-46. doi:10.1111/jvim.16606 ↩︎
    10. All Trades DVM DCM Timeline ↩︎
  • The Hill’s Science Diet Recall for Vitamin D

    The Hill’s Science Diet Recall for Vitamin D

    The pet community has jumped head-first into yet another social-media-fueled panic about certain pet food brands. Once again, misinformation is spreading, rampantly! The now-closed Hill’s Science Diet Recall 1 for Vitamin D has been brought up by concerned pet parents and influencers as “proof” of a bigger problem, and I wanted more information.

    A Facebook group, led by a pet owner who claims to have been the lead plaintiff in (and “won”) the lawsuit against Hill’s Science Diet, utilizes its platform to advocate for raw and “natural” diets for pets.

    The group actively discourages members from trusting veterinarians and feeding kibble, likening it to “playing Russian Roulette with your pet“. They openly criticize brands like Hill’s, Purina, and Royal Canin, alleging they contain fillers and toxins that primarily serve the companies’ financial interests.

    That was a mouthful, but it’s important in the context of this story.

    This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of Hill’s vitamin D recall, including the reasons behind the recall and why it may have been blown out of proportion.

    • Hill’s Science Diet Recall information
    • The Hill’s Class Action Lawsuit for Vitamin D (and how it was resolved)
    • How many pets were harmed by Hill’s Science Diet
    • How many pets died because of Hill’s Vitamin D Recall
    • Pet food manufacturing quality control
    Hill's Science Diet Recall

    Background on Hill’s Pet Nutrition

    Hill’s Pet Nutrition is a well-established brand known for producing premium pet foods, including heavily researched therapeutic “prescription” diets recommended by veterinarians for various health conditions. With an average 2023 revenue of over $4 Billion U.S.D., they are a major player in the pet food market.

    The company invests significantly in state-of-the-art research facilities. It employs a team of veterinarians, veterinary nutritionists, and scientists dedicated to advancing the understanding of pet health and nutrition.

    One of Hill’s most notable research facilities is the Hill’s Pet Nutrition Center in Topeka, Kansas.

    This cutting-edge facility spans over 80 acres and is equipped with laboratories and top-of-the-line animal housing areas where humane controlled feeding studies are conducted.

    Few brands meet this commitment to research and the advancement of nutrition.

    While it does elevate them above many other pet food brands, this doesn’t make Hill’s Science Diet exempt from mistakes.

    6

    The Hill’s Science Diet Recall for Vitamin D

    In January 2019, Hill’s Pet Nutrition received a complaint about possible Vitamin D toxicity in a dog that had eaten Hill’s canned dog food.

    Hill’s Science Diet investigated and then quickly alerted the FDA that they were issuing a voluntary recall of select canned dog foods due to elevated levels of vitamin D.

    A recall was issued on January 31st, 2019.

    Following that recall, we conducted a detailed review of all canned dog foods potentially impacted by the vitamin premix with elevated levels of vitamin D. This review included: analyzing consumer complaints; reviewing veterinarian medical consultations; auditing our supplier; and reviewing our own manufacturing and quality procedures. We then did additional product testing to ensure we had taken all appropriate action.

    Hill’s Science Diet Press Release

    Hill’s indicates in their press release that a “limited number of complaints” came in. Not thousands.

    Elevated levels of vitamin D2 can lead to potential health issues in pets, including symptoms such as vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling, and weight loss. In some cases, it can lead to death.

    A pet’s size and overall health affect its capacity to metabolize excessive amounts of Vitamin D.

    Following the initial recall, the FDA requested that Hill’s Science Diet conduct testing on their retention samples. Retention samples refer to portions of each production lot that are retained at the testing facility in the event of any potential issues arising.

    “Testing leading up to the January recall and the March and May recall expansions found that samples of the dog food contained excessive, potentially toxic amounts of vitamin D.”

    U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)

    Of course, this is a scenario that should never happen, however, it did. There is no disputing that Hill’s Science Diet distributed contaminated food and that some dogs were made sick by it.

    I’ll dig into that more, below.

    7

    Hill’s Science Diet Recall Timeline

    Here is a timeline of events related to the vitamin D recall:

    January 2019 – Hill’s Science Diet Received a report of a pet sick with possible Vitamin D toxicity

    January 30th, 2019 – DSM Nutritional Products, the supplier of the vitamin pre-mix used in Hill’s Science Diet, issued a recall for the ingredient3. A single employee had included an extra drum of Vitamin D, instead of Vitamin E, into the mix.

    January 31st, 2019 – Hill’s Pet Nutrition Voluntarily Recalls Select Canned Dog Food4 for Excessive Vitamin D.

    February 1st, 2019 – The FDA started inspections of the pet food manufacturing facility.

    February 2019 – A media frenzy ensued, with countless pet owners anecdotally reporting on social media that their pet had been sick from eating Hill’s Science Diet of all kinds (including kibble) up to a year prior. (This is reminiscent of the questionable 2023-2024 “Purina Panic”).

    Many of these reports lacked solid evidence, as pet owners attributed various ailments without providing full context.

    February 11th, 2019 – One lawsuit of many, Bone et. al. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. et. al.5 1:19-cv-00831 is filed. The text of the lawsuit indicates a belief that “As a result of online consumer complaints, Hill’s thus knew or should have known of the elevated vitamin D levels in the Specialty Dog Foods by at least February of 2018.”

    The lawsuit alleges that Hill’s Science Diet knowingly sold toxic food for an extended period, including dry pet foods that were not part of the recall. The plaintiffs claim their evidence for this assertion stems from anecdotal consumer reports observed on social media.

    February 11th, 2019 – The FDA tested two samples of Hills Prescription Diet Digestive Care i/d Low Fat (SKU Number 10423). The results showed:

    Lot code T1911124 3912 had: 100,170 to 107,282 IU/kg of vitamin D

    Lot code T1911125 3912, had 102,829 to 102,346 IU/kg of vitamin D

    Scientific literature suggests that concentrations exceeding 4,000 IU/kg of dry matter can induce symptoms, with higher levels correlating with more severe health problems and the potential for death.

    There is no question that some pets were harmed by this.

    March 20, 2019 – The recall is expanded to include additional formulas, following the testing of retention samples. Some of those formulas had not yet been distributed, and thus, posed no harm to pets.

    Hill’s Science Diet states that they have “received a limited number of complaints of pet illness related to some of these products.”

    May 17, 2019 – An additional lot code is added to the recall list when it was discovered to have been left off the March recall in error.

    All told, one source I found indicated that 86 total lots of 33 varieties of Hill’s Canned Pet Foods were recalled.

    That’s 675,000 cases—or 13.5 million cans

    November 2019 – A warning letter from the FDA nailed Hill’s Science Diet for failing to follow Hazard and Risk-Analysis prevention.

    During our inspection of your facility, FDA Investigators noted violations of the Hazard Analysis and Risk- Based Preventive Controls requirements for animal food found in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 507, subpart C (21 CFR part 507, subpart C).

    FDA Warning Letter to Hill’s Science Diet, November, 20196

    Some, but not all of the foods were part of the “prescription” line. No dry food or treats were affected.

    The Hill’s Vitamin D Recall was terminated on 12/21/2021, indicating that the company had responded satisfactorily and that there was no more threat to pet health.

    Hill’s Science Diet made some major errors leading up to the recall.

    21

    How Did Hill’s Science Diet End Up With Too Much Vitamin D?

    The manufacturing process involves the addition of specific vitamins and minerals to ensure the nutritional balance of the pet food.

    The elevated levels of vitamin D in Hill’s Science Diet products during the recall were attributed to a supplier error in the vitamin pre-mix that was used. 7

    A pre-mix should contain the correct levels of each nutrient, however, in this case, something was wrong.

    An Employee at DSM Nutrition Products, the maker of the vitamin package used by Hill’s Science Diet pet food, had supposedly poured a drum of Vitamin D, instead of Vitamin E, into the batch of pre-mix.

    Veterinary Information Network8

    How Hill’s Science Diet specifically missed the elevated vitamin in numerous lots remains to be understood. Understandably, this has caused many pet parents and veterinarians to lose trust in the company.

    Regrettably, pet owners are left to speculate, and the speculations propagated by influencers and bloggers in this field have led to significant levels of panic, fear, and misinformation regarding the topic.

    Hill’s Science Diet asserts that they have revised their criteria for third-party ingredient suppliers and have enforced more rigorous testing and safety standards internally. The issue should never have happened and Hill’s Science Diet deserves some fallout from the veterinary and pet community.

    As with many things like this, however, there is no proof of an ongoing, or widespread issue involving “thousands of deaths”.

    12

    How Many Pets Were Harmed by the Hill’s Vitamin D Recall?

    The exact number of pets affected by the Hill’s Vitamin D recall is challenging to ascertain.

    While Hill’s initially reported receiving complaints related to approximately 0.1% of their product volume, the actual number of pets harmed remains uncertain.

    Pet owners across various regions reported instances of illness and, tragically, some deaths potentially linked to elevated Vitamin D levels in Hill’s pet food. Many claim, online, to have experienced harm up to a year before the recall. Certain people outright blamed any foods in Hill’s product line, including cat food and kibbles that were not part of the recall.

    However, without comprehensive reporting mechanisms or centralized data collection, determining the precise extent of harm inflicted on pets is difficult.

    There is no published proof that excessive levels of Vitamin D harmed or killed “thousands of pets” as is commonly reported.

    Hill’s Science Diet addressed complaints and, upon receiving evidence from pet owners such as purchase receipts and veterinary records, willingly covered veterinary expenses related to any verifiable illnesses attributed to their products.

    Several unverifiable online reports assert that certain individuals were “offered only $5 or $10 coupons as compensation for their pet’s demise.” It is reasonable to surmise that these individuals may have lacked evidence substantiating their assertion that Hill’s food was responsible for their pet’s health issues.

    In simpler terms, there is a possibility that they attributed the issues to food not included in the recall, had no veterinary records, or their pet’s records indicated a conflicting diagnosis unrelated to the food in question. Hill’s Science Diet pet food doesn’t have a responsibility to pay veterinary bills for those people.

    Author’s Note: If you suspect your pet has been made sick by food, especially if there is a recall of that food, see a veterinarian! Get a diagnosis showing that the food caused your pet’s health condition. Save the food in its original container, and report your case to both the manufacturer and the FDA.

    Avoid online speculation and at-home diagnosis, as these things are hard to receive compensation for if damages are legitimately due.

    Some pet owners with verifiable claims declined to receive assistance and compensation from Hill’s and instead, filed lawsuits (35 of which were combined into a single class action that resulted in a settlement. More on this below).

    At its core, the class-action settlement did little more than award some lawyers a payment of cash, and worse, delayed pet owners receiving payment to cover their veterinary expenses.

    What’s more, there is no proof that any of the more egregious claims made by the lawsuits (such as Hill’s “knowingly” selling contaminated food and hiding the truth from consumers) were true.

    1

    The Bone vs. Hill’s Lawsuit

    As mentioned earlier, one of the plaintiffs involved in Hill’s Class Action lawsuit surrounding the vitamin D incident has become a significant influencer in the world of Holistic pet care.

    Her 13-year-old dog Duncan was suffering from pancreatitis when her veterinarian recommended a Hill’s diet to help with his symptoms. Pancreatitis is a common condition with a range of causes, including poor diet, obesity, genetics, and certain medications.

    The diet she fed to alleviate his pancreatitis symptoms was recalled two weeks after her dog died. Her veterinarian said that his enzymes were elevated, but not enough to kill him. Despite this, his health declined quickly and he was put to sleep. She had a very valid claim against the Hill’s food, as it likely contributed to his early death.

    His owner sought a minimum of $13,500 to cover her veterinary bills and the cost of replacing him with a new service dog. I was unable to determine how much of the final settlement she received.

    According to her lawsuit, which was filed jointly with two other plaintiffs who had legitimate claims against the food itself, she asserted a belief that Hill’s Science Diet was aware of the excessive vitamin D in the product and had delayed initiating a recall.

    Here is an excerpt from her lawsuit against the company, outlining one of the claims for which she sought damages:

    “Dogs that consumed Hill’s products which are not yet part of the recall are exhibiting symptoms of vitamin D toxicity. For example, Plaintiffs have heard complaints from a number of consumers whose dogs ate dry dog food (rather than canned dog food) sold under the Hill’s Prescription Diet and Science Diet brand names and who reported that their dogs’ symptoms are consistent with vitamin D toxicity. Thus, it appears that Hill’s has recalled only a subset of its affected Specialty Dog Foods.”

    From Bone et. al. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition Inc. et. al.

    This assertion lacks concrete evidence, relying solely on unsubstantiated information gathered through social media platforms. It necessitates readers to assume that both the FDA and Hill’s Science Diet were intentionally concealing a known problem and that they didn’t investigate claims.

    When you hear people say that “Hill’s dragged their feet” or “waited 6 months to recall contaminated food“, this is where that information is coming from.

    However, without a court judgment, verifiable proof, or official statements from credible sources, such claims remain speculative and should be approached with caution.

    The plaintiff-turned-influencer often claims to have “won her case” against Hill’s, but the truth is that her lawsuit, along with others similar to hers, were consolidated into a single case. That class-action suit (more info below) ultimately led to a settlement agreed upon by both parties, not a judgment.

    Additionally, the judge ruled that her claims related to dog and cat food not covered in the settlement were excluded. She did not “win” this part of her argument.

    “The cat and dry dog food-related claims included in Bone, et al. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc., et al., No. 19-CV-02284-JAR-TJJ, are expressly excluded from this Settlement”

    Hill’s Class Action Settlement

    That was several years ago now (2021), and there is no evidence to suggest that she has pursued these claims in a new lawsuit, let alone one with a viable argument supported by fair and verifiable evidence.

    8

    The Hill’s Class Action Settlement of $12.5 Million

    Several smaller lawsuits, including Bone v. Hill’s, were combined into one class action, which led to a settlement.

    A settlement in a class action lawsuit refers to an agreement reached between the parties involved in the case, typically the plaintiffs (representing a class of individuals) and the defendant (usually a company or entity). This agreement resolves the legal dispute without the need for a trial.

    As outlined in this court document9, the lawsuit progressed through legal channels, eventually culminating in an agreement between the parties involved. The settlement, valued at $12.5 million, aimed to provide financial relief to affected pet owners and underscored Hill’s Pet Nutrition’s acknowledgment of its responsibility in the matter.

    The settlement funds were allocated to reimburse pet owners for veterinary expenses related to the recall and to provide refunds for the purchase of the recalled products.

    4 million dollars of the settlement were allocated towards legal fees and counsel.

    In a settlement, all representing parties must agree to the terms.

    Thus, the plaintiffs agreed to accept a $12.5 million payout to satisfy the harm done to their pets by Hill’s mistake.

    While some may argue that the settlement amount is insufficient, it’s important to note that without evidence of additional harm, Hill’s couldn’t be deemed accountable.

    Two members of the class action formerly objected to the settlement. One of them failed to both substantiate her claim and submit a timely objection (Swaim), while the other (Hawley) was overruled with the following commentary:

    While a class member may wish to receive an unlimited amount of money from a settlement, that wish does not make the settlement unfair, inadequate, or unreasonable.”

    https://www.classaction.org/media/bone-et-al-v-hills-pet-nutrition-inc-et-al.pdf

    Anyone can make a claim or initiate a lawsuit, but only those supported by credible evidence can substantiate their case. Anecdotal online reports, lacking concrete proof, do not constitute evidence.

    12 1

    Purina Dog Food & Viral Social Panic

    This is the same thing we are seeing play out yet again with Purina in 2023-2024. A single, since-debunked viral post of heavy metals in the food sparked a public outcry where thousands of pet owners began claiming that Purina food harmed their pets.

    A considerable number of pets reportedly affected by Purina dog and cat food did not receive veterinary care, and if they did, their diagnoses were unrelated to food-related issues.

    Calls for recalls and class action lawsuits gained momentum as individuals initiated these actions based on their at-home diagnoses, attributing their pets’ conditions to the food. They don’t have toxicology reports or proof of these claims, and multiple laboratory results showed that their claims were without merit.

    The outcry is isolated to members of the social media group that is, of course, run by the “former Plaintiff from the Hill’s Recall that won her case“.

    While we can understand and empathize with her heartache, it’s important to note that there is a lot more to this story.

    5

    Notable Vitamin D Recalls in Pet Food

    Several other pet food brands have faced recalls for elevated levels of vitamin D in their products, contributing to a broader concern within the pet food industry.

    Some notable brands that have issued recalls for vitamin D include:

    1. Sunshine Mills: In November 2018, Sunshine Mills, Inc. (Evolve, Sportsman’s Pride, Triumph) issued a voluntary recall 10 of several varieties of dog foods due to elevated levels of vitamin D, which were potentially harmful to pets.
    2. Nutrisca: In December 2018, Nutrisca issued a voluntary recall 11 of its dry dog food products due to elevated levels of vitamin D, which could cause health issues in pets. The recall was later expanded.12
    3. Lidl (Orlando brand): In April 2019, Lidl, as part of an expansion of the Sunshine Mills recall, recalled specific lots of its Orlando brand Grain-Free Chicken13 & Chickpea Superfood Recipe Dog Food due to elevated levels of vitamin D.
    4. Simply Nourish: In August 2021 Simply Nourish recalled 51,000 packages of frozen dog food14, due to excess vitamin D.
    5. Fromm Family Foods: In October 2021, Fromm Family Foods issued a voluntary recall of select canned dog food products15 due to elevated levels of vitamin D. The affected products included certain 12 oz. cans of Fromm Gold Chicken Pate Dog Food and Fromm Gold Salmon & Chicken Pate Dog Food.
    6. Nutrisource: In October 2021, Nutrisource (Tuffy’s) Pet Food issued a voluntary recall 16for certain lots of Pura Vita Tetra Pak Dog food.
    7. Purina Pro Plan Elemental: In February 2023, Purina voluntarily recalled some of their EL Elemental17 prescription dry food for elevated levels of Vitamin D.

    This leads us to the question of “why”?

    Pet food companies have a responsibility to ensure the safety and quality of their products through rigorous testing and monitoring protocols. Vitamin D levels, like other essential nutrients, must be carefully controlled during the manufacturing process to prevent potential health risks to pets.

    Some smaller pet food companies have questionable testing protocols, and may easily overlook something like this (hence the reason that “no recalls” is not always a positive thing).

    For large companies that produce food for millions of pets and perform thousands of quality checks each day during production, bigger questions arise about how something like that goes overlooked.

    Typically, it’s an issue with the ingredient at the supplier level. We saw this with the Pentobarbital recalls and the melamine recalls, too.

    That doesn’t make it ok, though. Call your pet food companies! Ask them what testing they do on the ingredients before, during, and after production. Find out if they manufacture their food, or outsource it to a large co-packing facility where they have less control over the final product.

    Ongoing pressure from pet owners, as well as research and development efforts, can further enhance quality control measures, ensuring continuous improvement in pet food safety standards.

    4

    Was the Hill’s Vitamin D Issue Blown Out of Proportion?

    While any product recall can understandably cause concern among consumers, some argue that Hill’s vitamin D recall may have been blown out of proportion for several reasons:

    Limited Impact

    The recall affected specific varieties of canned dog foods (around 4% of the product line), and the vast majority of Hill’s products were not implicated. There are no verifiable reports of harm from other products.

    While there may have been many pets affected in some way by the excess Vitamin D, their symptoms would have resolved when they were no longer fed the contaminated food. Ideally, those pet parents submitted claims to Hill’s Science Diet or participated in the lawsuit as a means to recover their veterinary bills.

    Some pets may have suffered fatalities directly linked to the contaminated canned food; however, there is no documented evidence supporting the notion of widespread harm.

    While acknowledging the inexcusable nature of the deaths of those pets, it is essential to base our understanding on verifiable facts and comprehensive data rather than anecdotal reports to form a clear and accurate assessment of the overall impact of the situation.

    Lack of Proof

    While various claims have circulated regarding the supposed harm to pets and perceived deficiencies in Hill’s Science Diet’s management of the food recall, it’s imperative to underscore the absence of verified evidence backing the idea of widespread harm or negligence.

    Many blogs and influencers have crafted a narrative that may amplify concerns, yet it’s essential to approach these accounts critically and rely on concrete evidence rather than anecdotal information.

    Without substantiated facts, it’s challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the extent of harm or any alleged negligence in this matter. I encourage readers to maintain a balanced perspective and rely on credible sources for a comprehensive understanding of the situation.

    Proactive Measures

    Rather than downplaying the issue, Hill’s did take proactive measures to address the manufacturing error and ensure the safety of pets consuming their products.

    While this issue should have never happened in the first place, Hill’s Science Diet did take steps to remedy the problem and change the practices that led to it happening.

    Understandably, some people may doubt the sincerity of those measures taken by Hill’s Science Diet. However, despite any skepticism, sales of Hill’s Science Diet have consistently increased each year.

    This upward trend suggests that consumers and veterinarians place their trust in the brand. This continued patronage could stem from various factors, including the brand’s long-standing reputation, quality assurance measures, and effective communication efforts regarding product safety and improvements.

    Ultimately, the sustained growth in sales reflects a level of confidence and satisfaction among consumers and veterinary professionals with Hill’s Science Diet products.

    In my view, I would confidently choose to feed Hill’s Science Diet, particularly after the thorough research conducted for this blog post. The process revealed several misconceptions I previously held about the entire situation. I feel a sense of relief about this now, and I hope that my reporting helps others do the same.

    Disclaimer: This blog post provides a general overview of Hill’s class action lawsuit and should not be construed as legal advice. For specific legal inquiries or concerns, please consult with a qualified attorney.

    Footnotes

    1. “FDA Alerts Pet Owners and Veterinarians About Potentially Toxic Levels of Vitamin D in 33 Varieties of Hill’s Canned Dog Food in Expanded Recall” ↩︎
    2. FDA Vitamin D Toxicity in Dogs ↩︎
    3. DSM Nutritional Products Recalls Vitamin Pre-Mix Used in Hill’s Pet Food ↩︎
    4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “Hill’s Pet Nutrition Voluntarily Recalls Select Canned Dog Food for Excessive Vitamin D.” FDA.gov ↩︎
    5. Bone vs. Hill’s Pet Nutrition Lawsuit ↩︎
    6. FDA Warning Letter to Hill’s Science Diet, November 2019 ↩︎
    7. Hill’s Science Diet Press Release “2019 Voluntary Canned Dog Food Recall: United States” ↩︎
    8. Veterinary Information Network: “Supplier identified in Hill’s pet food vitamin D-related recalls” ↩︎
    9. Hill’s Class Action Settlement Case No. 2:19-md-02887-JAR-TJJ ↩︎
    10. “Sunshine Mills, Inc. Issues Voluntary Recall of Dry Dog Food Due to Potentially Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    11. “Nutrisca Issues Recall of Dry Dog Food Due to Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    12. Nutrisca “Natural Life Pet Products Expands Recall of Dry Food Due to Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    13. “In Association With Sunshine Mills, LIDL Voluntarily Recalls Orlando Brand Grain Free Chicken & Chickpea Superfood Recipe Dog Food Due to Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    14. “Wet Noses Natural Dog Treat Company® Voluntarily Recalls Simply Nourish Brand Frozen Dog Food Due to Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    15. “Fromm Family Foods Voluntarily Recalls Four Star Shredded Entrée Canned Food for Dogs Due to Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    16. “Tuffy’s Pet Foods; Inc. Issues Voluntary Recall of a Limited Quantity of Pure Vita Salmon Entrée Dog Food in a Tetrapak Carton Due to Potentially Elevated Levels of Vitamin D” ↩︎
    17. “Nestlé Purina Petcare Company Voluntarily Recalls Purina Pro Plan Veterinary Diets El Elemental Dry Dog Food in the U.S. Due to Potentially Elevated Vitamin D” ↩︎
  • Purina Heavy Metals Test Results

    Purina Heavy Metals Test Results

    We wanted to give you an update on Purina heavy metals test results, because the verdict is in!

    Numerous pet owners are worried about giving Purina pet food to their animals, citing concerns about potential toxins in the food. The concerns began in 2023 with a toxicology screening report from Kansas State University, which showed potentially elevated levels of certain metals in Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach food.

    Both Purina and the FDA have looked into this issue. The food was retested at two different labs.

    FACT CHECK: Repeated testing found that Purina foods are safe to feed. The initial test results were incorrect, due to an error that occured during testing.

    Update: March 6th, 2024

    After the first round of pet food samples Dr. Morgan sent for testing came back clean (January), she implored pet owners to submit kibble food samples from their homes.

    She sent these samples to the lab, and the food returned clean once again.

    This information was buried in a 14-minute video posted to her YouTube and Facebook channels on March 6th. Dr. Morgan has spent thousands of dollars trying to prove that something is “seriously wrong” with the food and continues to turn up empty-handed.

    To deflect from these test results, her video contains nearly 15 minutes of speculation and misleading information, including:

    • Conspiracies about other sites “scrubbing” information
    • Pet stores and brands dumping food by the truckload (which has always happened for various reasons; this is not new)
    • Pet brands are offering discounts and coupons (she believes that they are desperate to give the food away)
    • Speculation that the food contains “pesticides,” which are supposedly what’s causing the problem, and continued testing is needed
    • Statements about a widespread problem of pet food containing bugs, spiders, and spider webs (apparently, this is happening despite the supposed use of ‘pesticides,’ which is hugely contradictory to her argument)

    She spends a lot of time discussing her theory that the food contains pesticides and believes that they haven’t found a lab willing to find the contaminant.

    None of the foods tested positive, but she believes they haven’t yet found the right contaminant to test for.

    A few moments later, she blames the lack of verified reports from pet owners on veterinarians not testing the stomach contents of the dogs who died (during an autopsy).

    This is also contradictory because if the food comes up clean in lab reports, the stomach contents would also come up clean. It’s not like the stomach contents magically reveal the supposed contamination when the food seems to have nothing wrong with it.

    Statements like this are deliberate and meant to mislead pet owners into continuing to believe there is a problem despite the complete lack of evidence.

    Dr. Morgan is now imploring people to send her photos and videos of pet food in dumpsters. This is precisely the kind of conspiracy fodder needed to perpetuate this ongoing “kibble fiasco” and does little more than keep worried (and susceptible) pet owners busy.

    At the same time, she continues to drag this out.

    Update: January 30th, 2024

    Two independent lab results from Purina came back clean, and the tests that Dr. Judy Morgan sent also came back clean.

    She spent around $4000 to have lab tests done on Purina Pet food. In a video on her Facebook page on January 30th, she mentioned that they did not find heavy metals, Aflatoxins, Pentobarbital, Melamine, Vitamin D, Clostridium, Listeria, or Salmonella.

    I will discuss this further, but the key point is that Purina does not contain harmful levels of heavy metals. Any contrary information you encounter is rooted in online rumors and a social media campaign leveraging fear-based marketing to promote “holistic” alternatives.

    Purina heavy metals test results

    Kansas State University KSU Heavy Metals Report on Purina Food

    In November 2023, a post gained viral traction on social media, suggesting three dogs fell seriously ill after consuming Pro Plan Sensitive dog food. The post showcased a portion of a document containing toxicology results from the Kansas State University laboratory.

    The report highlighted heightened levels of specific heavy metals, leading to understandable concern among pet parents.

    Numerous individuals questioned the reliability of the report. Purina is renowned for maintaining an extensive quality control and testing program. The notion that they would distribute food with toxic levels of heavy metals to store shelves appeared far-fetched.

    Furthermore, the report lacked crucial details, including the specific Purina formula tested (such as the lot/batch number), and reference numbers or information providing context on what an average value might typically be for similar foods.

    Despite the red flags, the holistic pet community grabbed hold of this and started spreading it around as “proof” that Purina pet foods are dangerous to feed. That is another discussion, which I cover in depth in another blog post titled “Is Purina Dog Food Making Dogs Sick”. You can read it here!

    19

    Heavy Metals Analysis Testing Error

    An update was released on January 15th, 2024. Purina published that the samples were tested again by Kansas State University AND Iowa State University’s Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory.

    The results of both tests confirmed that there had been a testing error in the initial heavy metals analysis for Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach.

    Purina pet foods are, in fact, safe to feed.

    Occasional failures occur in all laboratories. Contamination, storage and processing errors and equipment malfunctions can contribute to issues that skew test results. This underscores the importance of repeating critical tests and screenings to ensure accuracy.

    Unfortunately, this now-debunked toxicology screening has caused untold amounts of anxiety and panic among pet parents! Some people are still spreading the initial report as fact, which is misguided, misleading, and disingenuous.

    6

    Purina’s Response to Online Rumors

    Purina says that as few as two consumer reports associated with any food or product will prompt them to investigate. Due to the viral spread of the heavy metal screening test result on social media, hundreds of reports related to various products in their line were generated.

    In light of this rumor, our Quality Assurance team has reviewed all incoming consumer contacts, manufacturing, and quality assurance data (this includes ingredient testing, analytical data throughout the production process, and quality assurance post-production testing) for the past year.

    Purina Media

    To clarify, Purina did treat this matter seriously. As numerous pet owners seek explanations for their pets’ illnesses and fatalities, it’s crucial to recognize that pets can fall ill irrespective of the food they consume.

    There is no concrete evidence suggesting that Purina has caused harm to any dogs. Social media reports seem to stem from individuals who neglected veterinary consultation, disregarded diagnosed conditions (such as Parvo, unrelated to pet food), or attributed every ailment, from obstructions to poisoning and genetic disorders, to Purina.

    The media team at Purina has responded swiftly to all reports and has published a page with information about the online rumors. You can read it HERE.

    1

    Is There a Silent Recall of Purina Food?

    Despite proof from multiple University labs that Purina Pro Plan pet food is safe to feed, anxious pet parents and social influencers continue to promote the idea that a recall is imminent.

    Purina has consistently addressed this issue through multiple statements on its social media platforms and website. However, some individuals are reluctant to accept these explanations.

    Individuals who suspect that Purina is concealing information promote the notion that the company is engaging in a “silent recall.” Their theory is that Purina is quietly pulling food from store shelves but is not publishing a recall with the FDA.

    Of course, this is a theory with no basis or proof. It’s important to emphasize that a “silent recall” is purely speculative and lacks substantiated basis or evidence.

    Purina remains readily available for purchase from major retailers like Chewy. If it is unavailable in a particular pet store, it’s more likely due to a stock issue than a recall.

    There is no such thing as a ‘silent recall,’ and quietly retracting product from the market that has been proven to be harmful to pets would be both irresponsible and illegal. Information about any recall is shared immediately with the FDA, consumers, retailers and veterinarians.

    Purina Media

    Whether people want to believe it or not, most veterinarians recommend brands like Purina, Hill’s, and Royal Canin because of the amount of quality control, testing, and nutritional science behind those brands.

    Unless the FDA publishes an official recall, there is little (if any) reason to be concerned.

    13

    Purina Heavy Metals Test Results from Dr. Morgan

    Dr. Judy Morgan, a prominent holistic influencer leading the anti-Purina campaign, purportedly sent samples of Purina pet food to independent labs for testing.

    There is no information available regarding how she acquired, stored, or handled the samples, and it’s unclear whether they originated from the homes of pet parents who allege that the food harmed their pets.

    Despite several weeks passing, those results are still pending. While she attributes the delay to the time-consuming nature of the process, questions arise as Purina has already disclosed the outcomes of their comprehensive tests.

    The whereabouts of Dr. Morgan’s test results remain uncertain; despite this, she continues to promote that the food is full of toxins.

    Author’s Note: I am actively monitoring this social activity and the dissemination of misinformation by Dr. Morgan and her followers. Should she present test results, I will assess their validity and provide an update here.

    Is Purina a Trustworthy Company?

    Ultimately, pet parents have a choice in deciding whom to trust.

    The credibility lies with thousands of practicing veterinarians, board-certified Veterinary Nutritionists, and consistent test results from various laboratories. It’s worth noting that 46 million dogs are fed Purina each year and lead long, joyful, and healthy lives.

    On the other hand, there exists an opposing viewpoint promoted by “holistic” veterinarians who often engage in fear-based marketing tactics. This perspective advocates the belief that extensively researched foods like Purina are detrimental to pets’ health and contain toxins.

    Followers of this viewpoint have been urged to discredit conventional veterinarians and be skeptical of preventive measures such as teeth cleaning, vaccines, and flea/tick medications.

    They leverage this information to promote online courses, books, and alternative foods and supplements (which conveniently, they sell).

    We see this at play in multiple very concerning Facebook groups, which are run or moderated by Dr. Morgan. A lot of easily debunked misinformation is being spread, along with a healthy handful of promotions and brand recommendations (including products that she either owns or has a strong financial affiliation with).

    I think the choice of who to trust is clear as day. I stand with science, evidence, and critical thinking. My dogs eat Purina Pro Plan and are thriving; the proof is in the pudding.

    Notably, with few exceptions, most other social media groups on Facebook are now restricting discussions related to the current “Purina Panic.” This indicates a substantial number of moderators in the pet community actively curbing the spread of misinformation, and we appreciate that!

    Share your perspective! Do you trust Purina, or do you suspect that Purina food may have affected your pet? Feel free to leave a thoughtful comment below. If you align with our scientific approach, please share this post, too!

  • Is Purina Dog Food Making Dogs Sick?

    Is Purina Dog Food Making Dogs Sick?

    As we step into 2024, a viral news story has circulated suggesting that Purina dog food poses a threat to your pet’s health. Despite widespread concerns regarding Purina dog food making dogs sick, please note that there is currently no substantiated evidence supporting the claims propagated across various social media platforms.

    If you’ve come across our blog post, it’s essential to clarify that the information you’ve encountered is unfounded and likely falls under the category of fake news.

    We understand that a lot of anxiety and panic surrounds the issue of pet food and what is safe to feed our dogs, so we’re addressing this today with the most up-to-date information we can find.

    I’ll dive into this more below, but here is what we do know:

    • There is NO Purina Recall in 2024, as of this writing (January 5th)
    • There are no “soft recalls”. Purina foods are well stocked at all major retailers
    • Despite the implication that hundreds or even thousands of dogs are sick from Purina Foods, no one has provided proof
    • Many of the “sick pets” have illnesses such as Parvo that can easily be attributed to a root cause that has nothing to do with the food they were fed
    • No toxicology reports or post-mortem autopsy reports (necropsy) have been produced, not one
    • Purina had the food tested at two independent labs. Both labs showed that the food was clean.
    • The Pet Vet Corner Group is actively in contact with Purina and has indicated that Purina foods are (and have been) safe to feed
    • In the U.S., the solid majority of practicing veterinarians who see 100’s of dogs each month are not concerned, and no, it’s not because of “kickbacks” (that is a myth)
    • The FDA is looking into the reports (note, this doesn’t mean there is a problem, only that they must investigate things if enough people complain)
    • Influencers such as Dr. Judy Morgan are capitalizing on the panic to gain likes and followers, which they leverage to sell educational materials, holistic food, and supplements

    Updates

    This section will be ongoing to include important and relevant information.

    January 30th 2024

    On January 30th, 2024, at approximately 1 pm MST, Dr. Judy Morgan shared a video on her Facebook account. In the video, she disclosed that despite investing $4000 in testing, none of the samples she submitted were found to be toxic or hazardous. Further details on this update are provided below.

    February 2nd, 2024 – Snopes released a well-cited article with information about the claims against Purina. Of course, their journalism on this aligns with what I’ve written in this blog post below.

    “Snopes posted in the Facebook group to solicit comments from members willing to provide a verified, confirmed report (i.e., necropsy from a veterinarian) that linked Purina dog food directly to their dog’s illness or death. As of this publication, we have not received a response.” – Snopes

    Read the Snopes take on this HERE.

    March 6th, 2024—Dr. Judy Morgan released another video on her social media channels, this time with information about the results she received from a second round of laboratory testing on Purina food. This time, the food had been sourced from pet parents who believed their pets were made ill by the food and sent it to Dr. Morgan to be tested. Once again, the laboratory found nothing concerning about the food.

    Dr. Morgan deflected from this result by generating a narrative that the toxin must be some rodent poison the lab was not testing for. She presented a handful of theories to propagate continued conspiracy about this topic.


    We encourage you to note that Hello Danes is a research-backed informational source for dog owners. Leveraging fear and panic in exchange for clicks is against our code of ethics, so while many blog posts on this topic may attempt to induce anxiety and panic about Purina dog food, you won’t find that here.

    Read on!

    Purina dog food making dogs sick

    Is Purina Dog Food Making Dogs Sick?

    The current viral claims suggest that Purina is indifferent to the health of pets, refusing to recall the supposedly harmful dog food.

    Purina is a big player in the pet food market with an average yearly sales volume of 20 billion U.S.D. (Compare this to a small brand like Diamond, averaging just 1.5 billion U.S.D.). That makes Purina pet food a prime target for fake news about recalls and toxins.

    A group on Facebook (that I refuse to name, but if you’ve been there you know which group I’m talking about) has become the central hub for reports and activity related to Purina dog food making dogs sick. This group is engaging in cult-like activity, an observation that I will touch on below.

    The claims being made indicate that Purina food has made dogs “sick”. Others blame their dogs’ seizures on the food. The symptoms vary considerably.

    It’s important to understand that while the group has produced many claims of dogs being made ill after eating Purina, they’ve produced absolutely no proof of a link. In most cases, they don’t even have a veterinary diagnosis.

    The truth is that pet owners are terrible at understanding their own pets’ health and the root cause of behaviors and medical conditions. Just because somebody thinks Purina dog food made their pet throw up or have a seizure, doesn’t mean the food had any role in it happening.

    Is Purina Harming Dogs, or Are People Harming Their Pets?

    It’s very interesting to look at this from a social perspective. If a well-meaning pet owner is feeding Purina and is presented with information that Purina is harming dogs, they may begin to feel that their pet has been harmed by the food, too.

    What may have been a tummy ache from counter surfing is quickly blamed on Purina. The owner panics and shares this information with others, compounding a building problem of viral social anxiety. It doesn’t matter if their pet has been doing phenomenally on the food, having eaten it for years.

    Every digestive issue, bump, or behavior may now be assigned to the food by the pet owner, who is reacting with anxiety and fear.

    Worse, this owner is now particularly susceptible to being taken advantage of as others beg them to immediately stop feeding Purina, purchase expensive supplements, pay $10 for a list of “approved” pet diets, and “detox” their dog immediately with a cocktail of herbs and vitamins.

    They may even be led to completely disregard their veterinarian regarding nutrition, surgery, health care, vaccines, and parasite prevention. This leads to a form of medical neglect and abuse that is not talked about enough!

    Guilt, fear, panic, and anxiety rule in this situation, and that’s not healthy.

    pexels blue bird 7210754

    Does Purina Contain Toxic Heavy Metals?

    The event that set off the current Purina Panic was a post on Facebook from a “friend of a friend“. In the original post, she warned pet parents not to feed Purina because her friend’s dogs were very ill after eating Pro Plan.

    In that post, an image of a toxicology report from Kansas State University indicated that heavy metals were present in the food, leading to allegations that Purina had become unsafe to feed. This report lacked important information about the test, including reference numbers and the exact formula that was tested; leading many to have questions about its validity.

    Despite this, the holistic pet community hitched its wagon to that report and launched its latest smear campaign against Purina (and now, all kibble).

    Within two weeks the post with the toxicology report disappeared. While concerned pet parents continue to reference that content as fact, the truth is that the food had been tested again and it was shown that there were no problems with it.

    (I’ve created a second article on this topic, HERE, which discusses the Purina Heavy Metals testing in more detail).

    Purina and the FDA had looked into the report and the claims being made and found nothing wrong with the food. Not only that, no other adverse events were reported in association with that particular batch/lot number.

    Chances are, the ‘friend’ referenced in the original post had three sick dogs who had gotten into something. Anti-freeze or rat poison are common toxins that cause health problems emergency veterinarians treat all too often.

    Update: January 30th, 2024 NO Toxins Found in Purina Pet Food

    Dr. Judy Morgan invested close to $4000 to dispatch samples of Purina food to a laboratory for testing. Neither the specific lab utilized nor the formula and lot numbers were disclosed.

    Around 1 PM MST on January 30th, 2024, Dr. Morgan published a video on her Facebook Page, stating that the results were in and none of the tested samples contained harmful levels of the substances examined.

    In other words, repeated tests from multiple independent labs show that Purina does NOT contain toxins or dangerous substances.

    Many of us had demanded transparency, and hoped she would provide this information even if it didn’t support the arguments of “Saving Pets”. She embedded the details about the test results within the video, compelling people to interact with her content to discover the truth.

    I think the pet community deserves to see it in writing.

    In the video, she says that the samples were tested for:

    • Vitamin D
    • Salmonella, Listeria, and Clostridium
    • Aflatoxins
    • Heavy metals including cadmium, selenium, and arsenic (possibly others)
    • Pentobarbital (Euthanasia Drug and Anti-Seizure Medication)
    • Melamine

    None of the food that was tested was high in any of those values.

    I believe the logical progression for Dr. Morgan would be to now share the lab reports with pet owners, as well as the FDA and Purina, for review.

    Transparency in this process is a reasonable thing for people to ask for.

    In the video, she tried to downplay the significance of the test results by criticizing the AAFCO for what she perceived as its lax approach to regulations.

    In the video, Dr. Morgan mentioned her intention to send samples from “known affected lots” for testing. She also outlined her intention to explore other potential toxins and to persist with testing until she uncovers the root cause.

    As a writer and pet owner, I’m intrigued. With numerous pets supposedly falling ill at the hands of (from what they believe to be) one culprit, why aren’t people exploring alternative possibilities? If they genuinely seek to address the issue, and multiple independent tests consistently indicate that the food isn’t the problem, why not investigate other potential sources?

    3 1

    Purina Dog Food Health Claims

    In 2023, Purina did remove the probiotics from their Pro Plan Sensitive Skin and Stomach line. This understandably did cause a few dogs some digestive issues as they adjusted to the new formula.

    That doesn’t mean that Purina is full of toxins. It means that an already sensitive dog struggled with a diet change. It’s not fun for the pet owner or the dog, but it’s not inherently harmful, either (especially for those with a great relationship with their veterinarian).

    Does Purina Cause Seizures

    The implication that Purina causes seizures in dogs is blatantly false. That would require Purina foods to be laced with absolutely toxic levels of heavy metals. Why would Purina, who has no interest in losing profits or being part of a massive media frenzy, sell contaminated food?

    Legacy pet food companies such as Purina, Hill’s, and Royal Canin stand out as the only brands that extensively employ and utilize substantial and expert teams consisting of veterinary nutritionists, food scientists, safety experts, researchers, and quality control specialists.

    These companies not only own their manufacturing facilities but also rigorously test products at every stage, from raw ingredients to the final products available on store shelves.

    The notion that a multitude of highly educated experts would be involved in producing toxic or dangerous pet food is entirely unfounded. From a logical standpoint, it simply doesn’t make sense. None of those people employed by these companies wants that on their resume.

    On the flip side, caution is warranted with smaller pet food brands. Lacking the sales volume, highly qualified nutritionists, and research budgets of larger counterparts, many of these brands don’t even produce their own food.

    A significant number of the pricey “holistic” pet foods and supplements are manufactured in large factories producing hundreds of other brands. The pretty bags are nothing more than good marketing.

    Not to mention, it’s much easier for small pet food brands to get by by with selling contaminated pet food. Just take a look at the unprecedented 2023 Victor recall, proving that the brand had not been testing for or mitigating bacteria for at least a year.

    15

    What Percentage of Pets Have Become Sick on Purina?

    Purina feeds over 100 million dogs and cats every year.

    If the reported statistics were accurate (as of this writing, supposedly 664 dogs, and 219 cats for a total of 894 pets), it would mean that:

    0.000894% of pets fed certain foods have supposedly been harmed.

    The figure is extremely low, especially when taking into account that it includes dogs fed a variety of diets, not limited to Purina alone.

    If we add in the daily meals of the other brands implicated in this panic about kibble (which include Hill’s, Royal Canin, Instinct, and others), the percentage of “affected pets” related to “pets fed” is even lower than the number listed above.

    If the food were genuinely toxic or hazardous, we would witness a much higher number of ill pets (and veterinary records to go with them).

    Any pet harmed by food is one pet too many. However, there is no supporting evidence from veterinary records or toxicology reports for any of the 894 pets included in this statistic, as far as we have seen.

    Pets are added to this tally without considering their existing health conditions, and often in the absence of a veterinary diagnosis or test results. The criteria for adding a pet to this list is unclear and lacks both transparency and attention to detail.

    Understandably, individuals are in pain and seeking something to hold responsible. The loss or illness of a pet is always a heartbreaking experience. Pets, however, become sick and often die regardless of the diet being fed.

    It’s correlation, not necessarily causation.

    As the community of concerned pet parents has grown, so too has the list of foods categorized as “toxic” or “dangerous” by those compiling these statistics.

    The Number of Pets Harmed by Purina is Made Up

    Upon reviewing the Facebook group, numerous accounts detail pets allegedly harmed by Purina (and other brands of foods).

    However, these accounts lack essential evidence such as toxicology reports, blood panels, or necropsies, relying solely on speculations attributing the harm to Purina.

    Many of the pets in these anecdotal reports had suffered for days without seeing a veterinarian, before passing away. The owners blamed the food when any number of things could have been wrong.

    One instance involved a member sharing a photo of their deceased puppy at 9 weeks, where they blamed Purina as the cause of death. The owner casually mentioned that the veterinarian had diagnosed the puppy with Parvo (a deadly and common disease), but they felt that was incorrect and the puppy’s Purina food was to blame.

    Another account comes from a pet parent who shared her experience of feeding a 50/50 mix of Victor foods and raw meals, only to observe her dogs developing bloody stools. In an attempt to address the issue, she switched to a similar combination with Purina, but unfortunately, the problem persisted.

    Not surprisingly, the blame was placed solely on Purina, overlooking the fact that salmonella, a known cause of bloody stools, was the reason behind the 2023 Victor Recall. It’s crucial to recognize that raw food can also carry a risk of bacterial contamination.

    In another story, a dog suffered for 5 days with symptoms that should warranted an emergency veterinary visit. The owner didn’t take him to the veterinarian for a diagnosis, and instead, bought aspirin to give him. She blamed Purina for his death while admitting that he’d not eaten Purina at all for the past 6 months.

    These stories and many more just like them are added to the growing list of pets ‘harmed or killed by Purina’. This list is the same one that “holistic” veterinarians and moderators of this Facebook group are passing around as absolute facts.

    I have no doubts that there are sick pets. The doubt comes in when assessing the root cause, and determining if the food itself is actually the problem.

    As the group has grown, additional brands have also come under scrutiny. This has triggered a surge of frantic activity as anxious pet owners hastily switch foods in response to the heightened concern.

    Suffice it to say that a significant number of the “reports” are likely nothing more than owners who have misdiagnosed their pets at home. When you consider that these are often the same people who don’t trust legitimate practicing veterinarians, this tracks.

    8

    How Has Purina Responded to the Accusations?

    The wonderful science-backed veterinarians of the popular Facebook group Pet Vet Corner (with over 1.3 million members and counting) reached out to Purina.

    Knowing the reach that the Pet Vet Corner group has in the pet owner community, Purina was eager to respond.

    Purina clarified that:

    • 46 million dogs and 68 million cats eat Purina food each year
    • The quality assurance team at Purina Pet Foods leads more than 100,000 quality checks every single day, across the entire manufacturing process
    • Purina states that false statements about the brand are resulting in unnecessary stress for pet parents (we agree)
    • They take safety and quality very seriously

    Confidently, Purina also emphasized the importance of pet parents critically evaluating the sources behind the claims. They acknowledged that while some posts are from well-intentioned individuals genuinely concerned and aiming to assist, many other posts intentionally generate chaos and distrust, often as a means to promote and sell alternative products.

    If you are interested in reading the source of this information, visit this post in Pet Vet Corner.

    Is Purina Horse Feed and Chicken Feed Killing Animals?

    As if the claims about Purina pet foods weren’t enough, new content has surfaced implying that Purina Horse Feed and Chicken Feed are also causing health problems in animals.

    It’s important to note that Purina Mills (horse & chicken feed) is owned by Land O’ Lakes and is a completely different company than Nestle Purina (maker of dog and cat food).

    They do not share funding, facilities, or staff. Nestle Purina and Purina Mills are distinct entities, despite their shared name. Anyone disseminating misinformation on this subject is, once again, spreading false news.

    12

    What Should I Do if Purina Made My Dog Sick?

    If you believe that Purina made your dog sick, you need to first speak with your veterinarian. Take the following steps:

    • Seek emergency veterinary care, if necessary
    • Document the symptoms
    • Write down anything else unusual about the day the symptoms began. Did your pet get food off the counter, eat bunny droppings in the yard, get into the trash, jump off the deck too hard, or nose around in a place where they don’t belong?
    • Make a document with a list of all foods, supplements, treats, and medications that your pet may have ingested in the past 30 days
    • Keep the bag of food to submit for testing if necessary

    Don’t panic. There are many reasons for a dog to have symptoms (including seizures) that are completely unrelated to the food you are feeding.

    Until there is a legitimate FDA statement and published recall, there is no need to panic or be concerned about your pet’s Purina Dog Food or the advice given by your veterinarian when it comes to nutrition, vaccines, and flea/tick prevention.

    pexels jozef feher 2774140

    The Rumor Mill & Purina Pet Food with Dr. Em

    Dr. Em is a veterinarian with a scientifically grounded YouTube channel. Her videos present factual information supported by evidence and the professional consensus of her peers.

    She prioritizes a rational approach over fear-based tactics and sensationalism, and it’s a breath of fresh air!

    If, after reading this post, you find yourself still on the fence regarding the safety of Purina pet foods and other kibble brands, please watch her video on this topic.

    I also highly recommend checking out this podcast, which highlights Dr. Ruthann Lobos in an in-depth and approachable discussion about myths and misconceptions in pet food marketing. Many evidence-based veterinarians are speaking out on this topic, and have some incredibly valuable information to share!

    How Fear and Panic Become Profitable

    This section is for you if you want to dive with me into how a social phenomenon like this happens. Given how many pet parents have felt untold anxiety over this, it’s worth discussing.

    Celebrity veterinarians and influencers such as Dr. Judy Morgan (and others) have capitalized on the “Purina Panic” to gain likes and followers, which they leverage publicly to sell holistic food and supplements.

    The more people they can get to share content on the topic of “toxic Purina dog food”, the more people they can engage with their platform.

    Topics like this are sensational and this particular one took off like a freight train.

    The people who follow Dr. Morgan truly believe they’ve been provided with “the truth”, and “insider information” that the big companies and veterinarians won’t tell them.

    Pet Parents are implored, by many of these influencers to disregard the information they hear from traditionally reputable sources (veterinarians, educated professionals, scientists, etc.).

    Anybody who speaks up with an opposing viewpoint or legitimate data is canceled. Their posts and content are removed, and they aren’t allowed to comment.

    Members of Dr. Judy Morgan’s and the “Saving Pets” group following will reply with hate, vitriol, and snark towards anybody who presents with information that challenges what they are being told by their “leader”.

    Perhaps the most alarming thing of all is that provocative content is designed to incite panic and fear, and to what end?

    Follow the money. If a pet owner is concerned about something they have fed or given their pet, Dr. Morgan (who set the stage for that anxiety to build in the first place) and similar influencers can swoop in with solutions.

    Courses, memberships, recipes, and supplements can all be conveniently purchased, so pet parents can make sure their pet “lives forever”.

    This doesn’t mean that these influencers aren’t well-meaning. Many things like this start with concern and a desire to help.

    People need to ask more questions. However, these inquiries should not be directed solely at established pet food companies with extensive research histories and expert teams dedicated to nutrition science and food safety.

    Instead, the focus should shift towards questioning the self-proclaimed leaders who undermine these seasoned experts, especially if they are using panic to drive affiliate clicks, social engagement, and sales of the products they recommend.

    10 1

    Predatory Influencers & Social Media Groups

    While Dr. Judy Morgan has spearheaded much of the current panic about Purina dog food, she is not alone. Many influencers are leveraging the Purina-Panic to boost their engagement on TikTok, Instagram, Blogs, and Facebook.

    A large group on Facebook has become a hub for this viral activity. They claim to be fighting a good fight against “big pet food” and have begun passing out questionable nutrition, medical, and veterinary advice to members. The group in question is gaining hundreds of new members each day.

    I’m not going to lie – that group is one of many just like it, and it’s terrifying.

    Here are just a few of the culty tactics being used in this group to promote the unfounded idea that Purina Pro Plan, Purina One, and Purina Dog Chow (and now all kibble) are killing pets:

    • Removing comments that contain verifiable facts and opposing viewpoints
    • Banning members who challenge what is being said or recommended
    • Allowing and even encouraging members to practice veterinary medicine without a license (diagnosing and providing holistic “treatments”)
    • Actively discouraging members from trusting their real veterinarian
    • Discrediting established experts including veterinarians, food and nutrition scientists, and published research
    • “Love bombing” those who have joined the group, and reminding them that only they are doing the right thing for their pet
    • Recommending unproven and potentially dangerous treatments such as “detoxing” as part of their health and wellness protocols
    • Creating an “insiders” vs. “outsiders” community, where those in the group are “in the know” and those outside of it are harming their pets
    • Shaming anybody who doesn’t follow the belief system (applying guilt, fear, and anxiety to those who don’t “do better” for their pets)
    • Posting deliberately false, fake, and incorrect information as fact
    • Allowing the platform to be a hub of blatant misinformation, instead of moderating content that may cause unnecessary stress, anxiety, and hardship for people
    • Encouraging members to ignore experts, including scientists and veterinarians, under the belief that those people don’t care about pets and all of them are “shills with a bad agenda
    • Purposefully deflecting away from verifiable information that doesn’t support their claims

    It’s appalling how much of this aligns with Dr. Hassan’s BITE model for cults and cult behavior!

    What’s even more concerning is that some members and leaders of these groups have been actively discouraging people from seeking veterinary care and/or having their pet food tested for toxins and pathogens.

    Testing the food is a crucial first step in identifying potential issues, but the group suggests that sending samples for testing is futile because “major laboratories are [allegedly] affiliated with prominent pet food brands”.

    In essence, they propagate a conspiracy theory, insinuating a cover-up.

    Author’s Note: We believe that they fear that if thousands of individuals test Purina Pro Plan and the results demonstrate that the food is clean, their misinformation campaign will unravel. If this group truly wanted to save pets, they would work with Purina to sort out the alleged problem.

    The “Saving Pets” group is now telling members that if they go to the media to share their stories, they must first communicate with the group leaders.

    They want to fully control the narrative. If that is not a red flag, I don’t know what is.

    All Kibble is “Bad”

    As of mid-January 2024, the “Saving Pets” group has raised and promoted concerns regarding all types of kibble. They are advising their members that no kibble, regardless of brand, can be considered safe for feeding pets.

    Within hours of her posting that video revealing the test results, Saving Pets doubled down on their campaign advising members to switch as quickly as possible to a fresh or raw diet with no kibble.

    This appears to be a deliberate effort to shift the discussion away from the test results that did not support their claim that “Purina is full of Toxins.

    The “acceptable” brands recommended in the group include AllProvide, a fresh food brand in which Dr. Morgan has a huge stake.

    For those unable to afford commercially prepared fresh or raw diets, Saving Pets advises preparing homemade cooked meals for their pets.

    Group members and administrators caution against seeking assistance from Board Certified Veterinary Nutritionists for recipes, asserting that those professionals are unqualified “shills for big kibble” and may only provide recipes rich in carbohydrates and synthetic vitamins, according to the group’s perspective.

    Studies indicate that the majority of homemade diets are lacking in certain minerals or contain excessive amounts of others. The diets formulated by Board Certified Veterinary Nutritionists are the only ones that are reliably and correctly balanced. Further information can be found HERE.

    I am concerned that this panic will lead many into feeding unbalanced diets that ultimately, do harm their pets.

    10

    Pet Food Misinformation & Armchair Veterinarians

    I mentioned above that the group is banning members and deleting comments that question the leaders and the advice being given. They are not, however, shutting down blatant misinformation.

    In just 10 minutes, I found the following statements (which, suspiciously, remain un-moderated). Some of the comments came directly from moderators:

    • “If the pet parent has received a Covid vaccine, they have shed Covid on their pet and that’s why their pet is dead”
    • “After a hurricane when the dead animals are floating around, they are picked up in trucks and taken to the Purina pet food factory”
    • “Pet food contains snake venom. It’s true.”
    • “Covid wasn’t a virus. We were all being poisoned with snake venom in our food and our pets food!”
    • “Veterinarians sell euthanized pets to the rendering plant and the pets are ground up and used in pet food. The collars aren’t even removed, they grind those up, too.”
    • “Veterinarians prescribe things to keep your pet sick so they can make more money off of you.”
    • “CBD is the only safe way to treat seizures, read this guide on it, and don’t take your veterinarian’s advice, they don’t know as much as you do.”
    • “Do not take your dog to a vet! They will only shame you for your choices. This herb is all you need.”
    • All Purina food is manufactured in China.”
    • “If you don’t feed a whole raw or homemade diet, you shouldn’t even have pets.”

    What does the group gain from allowing extreme misinformation to be spread? More panic, more anxiety, and more alarm. All of which drive engagement, clicks, and sales.

    Author’s Note: All of the above statements in the list are easily debunked with actual science and proven facts. At Hello Danes, we do not endorse, subscribe to, promote, or believe in the statements shared in the above list titled “pet food misinformation”. The list was created using actual statements from members of a public Facebook group.

    16

    How to Spot Misinformation on Social Media

    If you are struggling to understand how so many people screaming from the rooftops can be so wrong, this part of the blog post is for you! When you are digesting media about pet care, dog nutrition, and veterinary science, cross-check the information you receive against facts.

    This checklist of how to spot social media misinformation can help guide you!

    Verify Sources

    Cross-check information from reputable sources, such as official statements from Purina, veterinary organizations, or trusted news outlets.

    The only way to verify that a dog food product has been recalled is by visiting the FDA recalls page. If it’s not listed there as an active recall, then it doesn’t exist.

    Reach out to the company being accused! A quick note to Purina itself can help clear up a lot of misinformation and misgivings you may have, for example.

    While they do have an interest in maintaining a good public appearance, there is no reason to believe that they are trying to cover anything up. That’s a bad business practice that would be devastating to their financial success.

    When consuming content from bloggers and social media influencers, it’s important to evaluate the sources of their information.

    Are they drawing from reputable and credible sources, or are they employing excessive embellishments to provoke panic and fear, conveniently distorting the truth?

    Guard Yourself Against Predatory Influencers

    Be aware of influencers who attempt to deceive by presenting closed or outdated recalls as if they were present-day issues. Many of the so-called ‘recalls’ causing panic are resolved and belong to the past.

    Stay vigilant and don’t be swayed by misinformation that inaccurately portrays outdated concerns as immediate threats.

    Be wary of any controversial type of influencer who is primed to present you with a solution to the problem they claim is there, especially in the form of an affiliate link or product you can purchase. Don’t let them control your mind with panic and fear-based sales tactics.

    An affiliate link presented in good faith, for a product that could be helpful to pet owners is one thing. A profitable link presented to pet parents as a solution to anxiety and fear is another. That’s the one you need to watch out for.

    Fact-Check the Information You Hear

    Use legitimate and unbiased fact-checking websites to verify the accuracy of claims. Misinformation often crumbles under scrutiny.

    In reaction to misinformation being challenged, you might observe that members involved in cult-like behavior may dismiss the facts as part of an intricate plot, urging you to distrust experts, disregard your veterinarian, and be suspicious about individuals with legitimate credentials.

    Instilling doubt in experts (in this case veterinarians, veterinary nutritionists, and legacy pet food brands such as Purina that are backed by decades of nutrition research) is a fundamental aspect of cult mind control.

    Exercise extreme caution in navigating this situation and promptly disregard any commentary that intentionally undermines those with authority.

    Evaluate the Expertise of the Person Giving the Information

    Assess the credentials of those providing information. Celebrity status doesn’t necessarily equate to expertise, especially when promoting alternative products such as ‘detoxes’ and supplements.

    This holds even when the individual is an expert with a veterinary degree!

    If a particular expert, such as Dr. Judy Morgan for example, holds an opinion that diverges significantly from the consensus of their peers, it’s essential to treat them as an outlier and subject their views to thorough scrutiny.

    Dr. Karen Becker is another veterinarian whose profit-driven platform and controversial perspectives warrant careful consideration and questioning.

    While it’s acceptable and even encouraged for content creators, including bloggers like myself, to share information about various pet care choices, it’s important to verify that their opinions align with science, research, and evidence.

    Pseudoscience, alarmist marketing, and woo-woo theories unfortunately sell very well on social media; learn how to spot it.

    13

    Holistic Veterinarians and Controversial Medicine

    Be alert to signs that raise doubts about the authenticity of stories, particularly those from public-facing veterinarians who label themselves “holistic.”

    The term “holistic” implies consideration for the entire body.

    In theory, a truly holistic approach means addressing the pets well being with every tool available (including science, research, and medicine).

    Holistic should not mean:

    • Discrediting and avoiding conventional veterinarians altogether
    • Dismissing legitimate science
    • Exclusively opting for “natural” treatments, forgoing anything related to evidence-based veterinary medicine (a practice that may result in medical neglect and abuse)

    Because many “holistic” practitioners unfortunately promote and adopt the beliefs listed above, the term “holistic” may serve as a warning signal.

    I’ve extensively researched the “holistic veterinarians” and “experts” propagating the current media frenzy surrounding Purina. It’s noteworthy that each one of them has a potential financial stake if allegations against “big pet food” prove to be true.

    They have the financial motivation to drive people away from evidence-based veterinarians and science-backed pet foods. I find this ironic, given how often they promote the idea that their traditional veterinary peers are “shills for Big Pharma” and only recommend foods because they “receive kickbacks“.

    There is, of course, a time and a place for “holistic” care and natural remedies. My veterinarian falls into the category of “integrative” and we do use some natural treatments for the animals in our home. At its core, “holistic” is not the problem (nor should it be).

    As a community of pet lovers, we must draw the line on profit-driven misinformation. Many “Holistic” influencers have taken on the role of contemporary snake oil salespeople, offering unproven and often overstated solutions to exaggerated problems. It’s easy to sell things when what you promote is controversial.

    They are often primed and ready to sell a course, book, membership, or supplement to solve our problems as pet owners, all the while utilizing provocative marketing tactics to make it happen.

    Because Holistic medicine falls on a spectrum, it’s important that we recognize the role thoughtfully implemented holistic care may have in our pet’s health.

    However, more importantly, we need to recognize when “holistic” has gone too far.

    Author’s Note: Everybody deserves to earn a living when they share their skills and talents. At Hello Danes, we do use affiliate links to help us pay for the costs associated with running this site. We also put a lot of effort into aligning ourselves with experts and presenting research-based facts. To be fully ethical and transparent, I have chosen to turn off ad serving on this particular article.

    11 20231129 211409

    Holistic Veterinarians & the Alt-Right

    In one post on Facebook, a “holistic” veterinarian (Dr. Barb Fox) suggested that links in her Facebook posts weren’t working because “Big Pet Food wants to prevent her from sharing the truth“.

    This resembles the conspiracy-style content often associated with members of the far-right group QAnon.

    When someone with credentials, like a veterinary degree, demonstrates a lack of critical thinking like this, it’s wise to disengage. Guard your time and attention, as misinformation can hinder your decision-making about pet care.

    It’s noteworthy that like all of the others, this “holistic” veterinarian who is spreading misinformation and predatory content operates a website selling online courses and books to solve your pet’s health problems the “natural” way.

    The formula is simple: induce anxiety in pet parents, create a sense of community, and sell the solution.

    On her Facebook page, Dr. Barb Fox shares content from an alt-right news source, signaling a concerning perspective. This is a discussion for another day, but it’s important to note that holistic wellness and elitism about pet food is a pipeline that feeds directly into anti-science conspiracies and alt-right belief systems.

    Holistic integrative “wellness” is often a dog whistle and that’s unfortunate. Too many “holistic” influencers promote anti-science and anti-veterinarian content, and that’s both dangerous and worth talking about.

    There is room for natural solutions and holistic care in science-backed veterinary medicine. But this is not it.

    The current media panic about Purina conveniently serves her financial interests, as it does for most other “holistic” veterinarians with online platforms. They are riding this wave for every penny it’s worth.

    13 1

    Please leave thoughtful questions and comments below!

    Disclaimer: As the author, I want to clarify that I am not affiliated with Purina. They have not sponsored or funded this article, and our site does not receive compensation from them. In adherence to ethical considerations, ad serving for this particular article has been disabled. This post does not generate any profits for the blog or myself and has been published at my own expense.

    Comment Moderation: This blog does not tolerate misinformation or hate speech that is directed toward the author, readers of this blog, or veterinary professionals. Constructive and well-articulated arguments from both perspectives of this discussion are welcomed and will be approved as time allows, provided they contain verifiable information and contribute to thoughtful discussions on the topic.

  • Victor Dog Food Recall 2023

    Victor Dog Food Recall 2023

    Victor dog food is a popular option for Great Danes. This week, pet owners across the nation have been shaken by the alarming news of an unprecedented recall involving ALL Victor dog food. The Victor Dog Food recall (2023) affects all formulas with an expiration date before 10/31/24.

    The massive nature of the current Victor recall underscores the critical importance of scrutinizing the quality and safety of pet food products, as well as the manufacturing practices of the companies we give our money (and trust to).

    As details emerge about the specific reasons behind the Victor recall and the potential risks posed to dogs, we will update this post. In the meanwhile, if you feed Victor foods to your Dane, you must immediately stop. Read on for more information.

    Victor Dog Food Recall

    Victor Dog Food Recall 2023 Details

    Here is what we know about the current Victor food recall:

    • ALL formulas are affected. If you have Victor in your home that was purchased before November 2023, it’s recalled.
    • The food may be contaminated with salmonella, which is a bacteria that can lead to symptoms such as diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps in humans and animals. In some cases, it can lead to death.
    • 7 human cases of salmonella poisoning have been attributed to Victor Foods, going back as far as January 2023. 6 of those cases are infants.
    • There are likely many more cases that have not yet been documented
    • The problem was initially discovered by a random 3rd party test of Victor Hi-Pro Plus that was purchased at a store

    There is also a timeline associated with this pet food recall which gives us some valuable (and scary) insight.

    1. Victor brand has “No Recalls”
      Victor prides itself on having had ‘no recalls’. Enthusiasts of the brand promote this as a badge of honor, not realizing that the company had been selling contaminated food for at least 10 months.
    2. Victor Hi-Pro Plus Recall September 3rd, 2023
      The South Carolina Department of Agriculture tests a sample from a random bag of Hi-Pro Plus purchased at a pet store. It tests positive for Salmonella, prompting the first recall which included 644 cases sold in 5-pound bags with lot code 1000016385 and a Best By Date of 4/30/2024 (See more here)
    3. Victor Beef & Rice Recall October 30th, 2023
      3rd party sampling was done again, and 3 lots of Beef & Rice were found to be contaminated with Salmonella. Victor Beef & Rice formulas in 5, 15, and 40 lbs bags with an expiration 06/12/2024 were recalled. (See more here).
    4. Victor Expands the Recall to Everything November 9th, 2023
      Days after the Beef & Rice Recall, Victor expanded the recall to include all foods with expiration dates before 10/31/2024. This includes all Victor foods manufactured at the Mid-America pet food plant in Mt. Pleasant, Texas, and formulas from Wayne Feeds, Eagle Mountain, and Members Mark (which are also manufactured by the facility. (See more here). If the bag says Victor, it’s been recalled.
    5. The FDA Releases an Advisory about the Victor Recall November 9th, 2023
      The FDA created a page in collaboration with the CDC with information about the Mid America Victor Pet Food recall that includes more detailed information about documented illnesses, procedures, recommendations, and the timeline of reported illnesses. (See more here).
    17 1

    Can a Dog Eat Victor Recalled Food?

    The FDA, the CDC, and the authors of this blog recommend that Victor Dog Food be destroyed so that no humans or animals can touch or eat it.

    Even if your dog seems to have no ill effects, a pet with salmonella in their gut can shed the bacteria in their feces. Additionally, food bowls, your pets eating area, and their saliva may be contaminated and contribute to the spread.

    In other words, if your dog is eating salmonella contaminated food and then gives you kisses, you could become sick.

    While many people can get over salmonella poisoning at home with a few uncomfortable trips to the toilet, many others end up in the hospital. The CDC considers a salmonella outbreak to be a serious event.

    If you have an immunocompromised person, infant, or elderly person in your home it is especially important that you take precautions with food that may be contaminated with salmonella.

    We recommend a cold-turkey switch to a brand that meets WSAVA guidelines (more on this below).

    If My Dog is Not Sick, Can They Keep Eating Victor?

    No.

    Many dogs do not show symptoms of Salmonella poisoning (though some do), even if they are actively carrying and shedding the bacteria from their stools and saliva.

    Even if your pet seems to be “just fine” eating the Victor dog food in your pantry, it is recommended that you immediately switch.

    There is also an ethical dilemma at play if you continue to feed Victor food despite the current recall. We must hold Victor accountable for their poor quality control. By seeking a refund for the potentially contaminated food that you purchased, Victor bears the financial burden of the mistake (as they should).

    Additionally, if your pet is shedding salmonella while out and about they could make others sick. This could result from them visiting with kids, going to the nursing home as a therapy dog, pooping in public areas (even if you scoop it up), and other normal activities.

    13

    What are the Signs of Salmonella Poisoning

    Both dogs and humans can become sick from Salmonella. Now that the Victor recall has been posted, MANY people are realizing that they or their pet had been made ill with food poisoning at some point in 2023, but never considered that it could have been because of their pet’s food.

    The symptoms of salmonella poisoning in dogs and humans are very similar:

    • Nausea (May result in pets turning their nose up at Victor Food)
    • Diarrhea
    • Blood in Stool
    • Vomiting
    • Lethargy or Low Energy
    • Fever
    • Abdominal Cramps

    Salmonella infection can also lead to heart problems, eye problems, arthritis, muscle pain, and urinary tract symptoms.

    If you or your pet have had these symptoms, and your pet was eating Victor food (or one of the other brands included in the current expanded recall), you are encouraged to report it to your veterinarian, your doctor, and the FDA.

    You can file a safety report to the FDA by visiting this page.

    How to Kill Salmonella Bacteria

    Salmonella is not destroyed by freezing temperatures.

    Killing or eliminating Salmonella involves thorough cooking of contaminated food items. Cooking your pets kibble to destroy any potential salmonella contamination is not recommended, however, as this may alter the nutritional balance of the food.

    Practicing good hygiene by washing hands thoroughly with soap and water after handling Victor kibble or coming into contact with potentially contaminated surfaces is essential. After you dispose of your Victor food, thoroughly wash and sanitize the feeding area, scoops, and bowls.

    If you use a pet food storage container, it must also be thoroughly sanitized.

    Unfortunately, dish soap doesn’t kill bacteria; so depending on how thoroughly you wash something, it may still require sanitization. If your dishwasher has such a cycle, we recommend using it!

    These Food Safe Purell Sanitizing Wipes are “food safe” and would help clean around the feeding areas (floors, counters, etc.)

    12

    Recalled Victor Food Alternatives

    If you have been affected by the Mid America Victor food recall and need alternative foods, we recommend sticking to brands that meet WSAVA guidelines and thus, have exceptional quality control practices.

    For more information on WSAVA guidelines and how to choose a quality pet food based on them, read here.

    Pet food manufacturers that meet WSAVA recommendations have transparency in pet food labeling, exceptional quality control, and highly qualified nutritionists involved with the formulation of the food.

    Here is our list of pet foods that meet WSAVA recommendations, are ideal for large & giant breed dogs, and provide a veterinary-approved alternative to Victor pet foods. If you are shopping for a small or senior dog, choose a comparable formula from the same company:

    Check out THE GIANT DOG FOOD PROJECT to compare brands and values.

    If you are looking to stay away from the “Big 5” for some reason (though, we urge you to reconsider), other brands that are close contenders include grain-inclusive Farmina, Annamaet, and Instinct Kibbles.

    How to Switch from Victor to Another Brand

    It is important that you immediately stop feeding Victor altogether. We recognize that this can be upsetting for pet owners that feel their pet has done well on Victor food. However, there are many alternatives out there and switching quickly is important!

    Once you have chosen a food, thoroughly sanitize your pets eating area and then offer a SMALL meal of the new food.

    Instead of offering two meals, offer 3-4. Split the food up over the course of the day.

    Additionally, for the first few days, reduce the overall amount that you offer! Many pets want to gorge on new food because it’s novel and interesting; do NOT allow this unless you want a yard full of poop!

    Check the feeding recommendations on the bag, too. Chances are, you can feed LESS food if you choose a brand like Purina Pro Plan, Royal Canin, or Hill’s! Overfeeding is a COMMON cause of loose stools and the nutritional values will likely be different on a new food that you choose.

    We do not recommend adding toppers or supplements, nor do we recommend switching to chicken & rice homemade diets as they are nutritionally deficient. These practices will only prolong the process.

    We recommend shopping at Petsmart or Chewy, and choosing autoship to save money and time. If your pup has digestive upset for more than a few days, see your veterinarian!

    8

    Victor Pet Food Quality Control & Recalls

    It’s crucial to understand that recalls aren’t inherently negative. Some companies promptly issue small recalls as a testament to their commitment to prioritizing pet health over marketing and profits.

    However, the magnitude and context of the recall involving Victor pet foods serve as a clear example of a problematic recall, prompting a reassessment of our perception of the brand.

    Many people have rewarded Victor for having had “no recalls” in the past.

    We can now clearly see that this was misguided, as the current recall shows a problematic issue with quality control.

    The reality is that a company boasting “no recalls” may simply be overlooking (or worse, ignoring) potential issues.

    Pet food manufacturers should prioritize routine and thorough equipment sanitization, along with batch testing, to virtually eliminate the risk of pathogens like aflatoxins, salmonella, and E. coli in their products.

    The salmonella contamination in Mid America Pet food was caught twice by 3rd party testing, not the company itself. This is a glaring indication that a crucial step was missed.

    Salmonella poisoning cases associated with this outbreak date back into January, 9 months prior to the first recall. This is an indication that contaminated food has been on store shelves for the better part of a year. For many pet owners, this has explained a lot of problematic symptoms they had seen in their pets for the last several months.

    A quick search through many Facebook dog groups indicates that many pets have actually been sick. It took a massive recall for people to figure out why.

    How has Mid America Pet Foods Responded to the Recall?

    Unfortunately, Mid America (the makers of Victor foods, as well as the manufacturing plant for Eagle Pack, Wayne Feeds, and Member’s Mark which were also recalled) has had a questionable response to the recall.

    Numerous pet owners mention enduring lengthy waits on hold, spending hours waiting to connect with a representative only to be told that “Victor cares”.

    Other individuals have surfaced, expressing concerns about Victor pet food causing illness in their pets before the recall. After reaching out to Victor about this, these owners consistently cite that the company failed to acknowledge any responsibility for the reported issues.

    Worse, Victor representatives are telling some people that the salmonella recall was done out of “an abundance of caution” and that the Beef & Rice formula is truly the only affected one.

    Given that the problem was found twice by a 3rd party test, and that salmonella is easily spread when food is exposed to contaminated manufacturing equipment, I’m not inclined to buy into their desperate plea to brush this off as “no big deal”.

    The designation of a recall as “voluntary” does not necessarily imply that it was initiated solely at the company’s discretion.

    Rather, it indicates that the company took the proactive step of reaching out to suppliers and informing consumers. This designation does not rule out the possibility that the FDA exerted pressure, or that the company could have faced regulatory action if it had not taken this initiative.

    In cases where companies are under serious scrutiny from the FDA and CDC (as is the case with Mid America Food at the moment), opting for a “voluntary recall” notice can be viewed as a strategic marketing move to stay ahead of potential regulatory actions.

    Does Victor Dog Food Meet WSAVA Guidelines?

    The solid majority of veterinarians, who see 100’s of pets each week and share advice passed down to them from board certified veterinary nutritionists will recommend foods that meet WSAVA guidelines. These foods include brands such as Purina, Iam’s, Eukanuba, Hill’s, and Royal Canin.

    Victor foods do not, and have never come even close to meeting WSAVA manufacturing and formulation recommendations. Here is a simple list of reasons why they do not adhere to basic ethics:

    • Victor foods does NOT have a qualified nutritionist on staff. Their ‘head chef’ has a science degree and an online certificate in companion animals from a farm animal organization.
    • Victor foods do not perform feeding trials or contribute to research with peer-reviewed science
    • Victor foods does not easily provide nutritional values on request: when we inquired about their calcium levels, we were told they would only speak on the phone (not in writing). They only publish their calcium levels on select bags and they do not share a guaranteed analysis of calcium, leaving owners to dig for this very important information.
    • Victor does not have good sanitation protocols and does not perform regular bacteriology screenings on their foods (an observation implied by the evidence, which indicates that they have been selling salmonella contaminated food since at least January, 2023.

    There is a reason that veterinarians always recommend that pet owners look past pet food marketing and instead, into the companies dedication to animal health, formulation, and quality control.

    19

    Victor Pet Foods for Puppies

    We do not recommend Victor pet foods for puppies, as the calcium levels are too high to be safe for growing large and giant breed dogs.

    You can read more about calcium levels in puppy food here.

    So if you’ve been feeding Victor food, now is a good time to choose a safer and more well formulated option!

    Read more about why we never recommended Victor foods here.

    Author’s Note: We will update this post as more information about the Victor Pet Food Recall becomes Clear

  • How Moldy Kibble Killed 2 Family Pets

    How Moldy Kibble Killed 2 Family Pets

    This is a heartbreaking post. I’m sitting here on a Sunday night and my newsfeed is flooded with this story about how moldy kibble killed 2 family pets.

    A family chose what they thought was high-quality, nutritious dog food. As a matter of fact, they paid a premium price for it, because they wanted something to support the needs of their working dogs.

    Hours later, one dog was dead. After a visit to the ER, the second dog couldn’t be saved, either.

    How did this happen? Why did it happen?

    I’m going to dig into the how and the why below, because I want you to protect your pet from this fate.

    301629669 5450875538328502 7922718990819601702 n

    It’s important to note that the food looked completely normal when they fed it to their dogs.

    It was only after the dogs were dead that they stirred the dog food and found the mold.

    What you see above is horrifying, but the owners should not be blamed. Mold spores can be present in food even if you can’t see them!

    To get started, I’m also sharing the original post from the owner of the two beautiful dogs that were lost. If you aren’t aware of this tragic story, you’ll want to start there first.

    As long as the social media post on this topic is live, it will show up below:

    https://www.facebook.com/alicia.gutierrez.5477/posts/5450875231661866

    Editor’s Note it is incredibly important to me that I share this story in honor of the two dogs that were lost. We do not blame the owners. Nobody should.

    Their story should help save the lives of other dogs and we are sharing it for that purpose, not to shame the owners (as many of unfairly done).

    The images below are from the original public Facebook post.

    how moldy kibble killed 2 family pets

    How Does Mold Get Into Dog Food?

    There are three main ways that mold can get into your dog food (and potentially kill your pets, too).

    Some of these avenues and the information in them may surprise you.

    At this time we do not know what factors led to the deaths of these two beautiful dogs. It was likely a combination of factors, not any one single issue.

    Unfortunately, these are risks we take just by owning dogs. Kibble is not inherently dangerous or unsafe! This is a rare situation.

    Poor Quality Control & Food Science

    There are 4 key things to look for in a dog food manufacturer. These things can help prevent formulation, food science, and control issues that lead to toxic food.

    All four boxes must be checked below for a food company to be considered ethical, in my opinion:

    • Do they staff at least one board-certified veterinary nutritionist (DACVN), or a veterinarian with a PhD in animal nutrition?
    • Do they have an extensive and strict quality-control process, starting with hand-picked ingredient suppliers and strict policies for sourcing, transportation, and production?
    • Do they own and operate their facilities, thus having full control over the process from start to finish? Where is the food manufactured?
    • Do they participate in feeding trials and peer-reviewed research? Is the nutrient analysis substantiated in trials or just on paper?

    Spoiler alert! I did a deep dive. The food brand that these dogs were being fed (Kinetic) could not check off a single one of those boxes, according to the information I was able to find.

    No recalls” may mean that the market share, quality control, and company standards are so low that the company just doesn’t know, or worse, doesn’t care when things go wrong.

    The truth of the matter here is that there are 300-400 new dog food companies each year in the U.S. and only a handful of highly-qualified board-certified veterinary nutritionists, food scientists, and quality-control professionals to go around.

    You do the math.

    301777631 5450876054995117 5034329842525103894 n

    These are healthy, beautiful-looking dogs.

    Poor Food Handling by Suppliers

    Of course, it doesn’t matter how the ingredients and food were handled from manufacturing to shipped if the end supplier mishandles the food.

    It could be a simple error; for example, a warehouse employee nicking a bag with a contaminated box cutter and then packing it to ship into a hot, humid area where it sits on a porch for a full day.

    Or perhaps the pet food store doesn’t unload food off the back dock for hours and it sits in the heat after shipping from a company with so-so quality control protocols.

    Of course, some things can go wrong from point A to point B, even when the food is made by the most diligent of manufacturers.

    Choosing reliable and reputable food companies, in addition to sourcing your food from dedicated and professional retailers is key to minimizing these risks.

    302086351 5450875421661847 541676257284329238 n

    Poor Food Handling by Pet Owners

    Another reason that mold can get into your dog’s food is improper handling at home.

    One of the biggest mistakes that pet owners make is to dump their dog’s food directly into plastic or metal bins!

    Here is a list of reasons why this common practice is dangerous:

    • If you dump new food on top of old food, the old food at the bottom of the bin may never be eaten (and will thus be festering)
    • Unless you are cleaning, sanitizing, and drying your bin between food bags, you risk contaminating your fresh bag of food with existing mold spores or parasites
    • Dog food companies put a lot of science into the bags, which are designed to keep the food fresh. Why throw that away?
    • Exposure to plastic may cause harmful chemicals in some plastic containers to leech into the food (especially when sitting in a warm garage, for example)
    • Plastic causes fats and oils to oxidize, which will expedite the process of the food going rancid
    • The residual and often then rancid fat and oils left inside of the plastic bin can cause all kinds of problems in new food dumped in later

    In short, if you are going to use a plastic bin to store your dog food, do two things! Keep the food INSIDE of the bag it came in, and store the food in a cool, dry place.

    301885912 5450875604995162 3806817776940019105 n

    What Food Brand Had Mold & Killed 2 Dogs?

    It has become widely known that the owners of these two dogs were feeding Kinetic dog food.

    Here is what we know about this company:

    • They promote Kinetic as a ‘working dog’ brand and spend a lot of time supporting hunting dogs, sport dogs, and police K-9s by attending events to market their food
    • The company does not staff a board-certified veterinary nutritionist; as a matter of fact, it’s unclear who formulates the food.
    • The owners may be formulating the food. Their self-given job titles include things such as ‘sales, distribution, marketing, and nutrition‘.
    • They have given k-9 nutrition talks but, as above, it’s unclear what (if any) legitimate credentials these guys have.
    • They claim that the nutrition research and formulations they’ve created are a collab between dog trainers, breeders, kennels, and ‘nutritionists’. Again, where are the credentials? Was this research scientific?
    • We cannot verify if Kinetic owns and operates its facilities. Chances are this food is co-packed.
    • We can find no peer-reviewed research or feeding trials associated with their food or the claims that they make regarding its benefits.

    This company is very, very good at marketing.

    We’re talking, health nut wrapped up in a multi-level marketing company kind of marketing.

    Screen Shot 2022 08 28 at 11.25.32 PM

    Tips for Choosing Quality Dog Food

    I’m a big fan of food that is backed by legitimate science and research, not marketing claims.

    If you can avoid the trap of being sucked into marketing, it becomes VERY easy to pick a nutritious, high-quality, and safe food for your dog!

    Marketing vs. Nutrition

    Ethical pet food companies will have a full-time veterinary nutritionist or at minimum, a veterinarian with a Masters in nutrition on staff to formulate the food. If you aren’t sure, call and ask.

    Keep in mind that small pet food companies don’t often (if at all) have the budget or resources to attract highly desired nutrition professionals, scientists, and quality control experts.

    These companies must rely heavily on marketing to sell their food because it’s all they have.

    A common practice of small manufacturers is to create a recipe on paper and then pay consultants (often marketed as a “team of nutrition professionals” to check a box indicating that the food, on paper, meets minimum requirements for keeping a dog alive.

    In other words, your dog is their feeding trial.

    Many common marketing terms are unregulated. These terms have no legal definition and can be used by any dog food company:

    • Holistic
    • Super-Premium
    • Wholesome
    • No Fillers
    • All-Natural
    • High Performance
    • Healthy
    • Species Appropriate
    • Biologically Appropriate

    Of course, none of these things are ‘bad’. A holistic, wholesome, high-performance dog food sounds awesome. The problem comes with the fact that lacking a definition, those terms may be intentionally misleading.

    Not to mention wild claims of longevity, or indicating that the food is anti-inflammatory or can prevent cancer.

    If it’s hard to find out who is formulating your dog food and what their credentials are, where it’s manufactured, or what research has been done, ask more questions.

    Look past the marketing and then choose something else.

    My dog is not eating. What can I do?

    So what is a good, sound alternative to Kinetic ‘performance’ food?

    Any 30/20 Sport Formula from Purina, depending on breed size and age, would be ideal.

    For example, Purina Pro Plan 30/20 Turkey, Duck and Quail Dog Food

    This was created by a team of veterinary nutritionists and was fully researched and developed soundly in collaboration with Ducks Unlimited.

    long coated brown dog on body of water
    Photo by Shane Aldendorff on Pexels.com

    How to Safely Store Dog Food

    I recommend storing your dog food in the original bag in a cool, dry place.

    That could be inside of a plastic bin, as long as the food stays inside its bag.

    Use bags of food up as quickly as possible, without overfeeding your dog, of course. The longer a bag is open, the more likely it is to go rancid or become toxic.

    Buy smaller bags if your dog doesn’t eat them fast enough.

    Lastly, seal the bag up each time you open it!

    Signs of Mold Poisoning in Dogs

    If you are concerned that your dog has mold poisoning, we recommend calling the pet poison hotline. You can find more information about this here: https://www.aspca.org/pet-care/animal-poison-control

    Signs of mold poisoning in dogs include:

    • Coughing
    • Lethargy
    • Blood coming from the mouth or nose
    • Runny nose & discharge
    • Disorientation
    • Vomiting
    • Seizures